Versions Compared

Old Version 7

changes.mady.by.user Former user

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user jim pasquale

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

2016-12-01


Approved at: 2019-12-12 Meeting notes (CR) DRAFT

Attendees

Voting

Non-Voting

  • David Turner

...


Info
titleQuorum Status
Meeting did not achieve quorum at any specific point during the call.

 

 



Info
titleVoting participants

Participant Roster (2016) - Quorum is 4 of 7 as of 2016-10-06

Iain Henderson, Mary Hodder, Harri Honko, Mark Lizar, Jim Pasquale, John Wunderlich, Andrew Hughes

Discussion Items

 


TimeItemWhoNotes
10 mins
  • Roll call
  • Agenda bashing
  • Meeting minutes approval
Former user (Deleted)

Meeting was not quorate - no minutes approval today.


 


15 min
Former user (Deleted)
  • Reviewed Introduction text edits
  • The next version should include a 'real' data model
  • David will finalize editorial changes; update new scheme; updating the new fields as required; including sample files; update the field order in the document
  • Consistency and formatting finalization
  • John will finalize the samples by December 5
  • David will finalize text on December 6
  • Aim for WG ballot December 7-13
  • Aim for LC ballot December 14-30
  • Aim for Start of All Member ballot January 2, 2017
15 minDiscussion on what's next on the roadmapAll
  • The list of subject areas that will be worked on:
    • Consent Receipt
      • There will be CR spec errata that will need to be fixed
      • A v1.1 will be required within 6 months after feedback from implementers
    • User Submitted Terms
      • Use case library and elaboration of use cases
      • UX design
      • Model contract language to support each feature of the UST elements
    • Requirements for API / Interfaces for CR and UST artifacts
    • Requirements (text) for implementers of Consent receipt generators (code)
    • Requirements (text) for Consent receipt 'viewer' (code)
    • Information Sharing Agreements
      • Architecture and model (text and diagrams)
      • Requirements (text)
        • Business requirements
          • Functional requirements
          • Non-functional requirements
      • Specifications (text)
    • Build a Kantara prototype implementation of a consent receipt management system
15 minDiscussion about changing the CIS WG structure after CR v1.0
Former user (Deleted)
Defer

 


CR Spec publication schedule

Current: call for comments on draft spec commences

Date
Event
Status
September 19Close of business (Pacific) deadline for feedback on spec draft including examples and feedback from implementers.
 

September 22WG call to review CR draft structure
 

September 29WG call to review CR draft and discuss items needing resolution
 

October 6WG call
 

October 13WG call
 

October 20Candidate draft to WG. 
Decision required if the draft is sufficiently mature to base an IIW session on it.
 

October 27Final working session for WG (with/without IIW comments) on candidate draft
 

November 3

Final draft for WG review

 


November 10

Working group ballot - must be approved by WG on Nov 10th

WG Meeting decision: Working group electronic ballot opens on Monday November 14 - to close end of day Monday November 21 2016

 


November 15Once CR v1.0 approved by WG, Send doc to the Leadership Council. They must approve it by Nov 30.
 

December 1NOTE: The draft has outstanding issues that the WG would like to have resolved prior to going for ballot.
  


Working group ballot
  


LC Electronic Ballot opens
  


LC Approval decision
 
 


Kantara all member ballot begins.
  


Earliest Spec approval date