...
Adrian: how can we start a SC withiout placing the policies (driving the SC) into the public domain. Policies means the riles of access: If I'm Alice and I don't want share my rules/policies (about accessing my resources), how to do this in SC? In the UMA case, the rules/policies are in the UMA-AS.
Jim: an SC does not need to public. In this case, Bob could take a shot and see if it works.
Adrian: there are lots of similarities between SC and UMA. Jim: the SC record codifies the legal text and executable. Thomas: yes there should be commonalities between UMA-AS and SC/Blockchains. SC has "if-then-else" which are like rules of access in UMA for AS, RO and requesting party. A node could in fact add UMA-AS capabilities.
Kathleen: for the BSC report, we need to express some kind of "future roadmap" on how to get from here to there. Thomas: may be suggest some recommendation points.
Marc: need a development methodology, just Jim/thomas paper at W3C blockchain conference in May: https://www.w3.org/2016/04/blockchain-workshop/interest/hazard-hardjono.html
People in France are also struggling on how to get from current legal model to SC in the future.
Thursday, October 6
Agenda:
...