Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Comment Reference: The GitHub repository issue number of the comment and possibly a reference to a subpart of that issue. All issues relevant to the Public Comment and IPR Review period use both the label "V2.0" and the label "public comment period". The content of all comments has been stored in GitHub.
  • Specification Reference(s): A reference such as "Grant Sec n.n" or "FedAuthz Sec n.n". "Grant" refers to User-Managed Access (UMA) 2.0 Grant for OAuth 2.0 Authorization revision 05 and "FedAuthz" refers to Federated Authorization for User-Managed Access (UMA) 2.0 revision 05, the Draft Recommendations under review. Note that issues relevant to each specification have been labeled "grant" and "fedauthz", respectively.
  • Editorial or Technical: Whether the comment involves an editorial change (generally a minor clarifying change to wording) or a technical one (generally a substantive change that may require extensive implementation work). Note that a label of "editorial" has been applied to issues that appear, at first blush, to be editorial.
  • Disposition: The Work Group's conclusion about the action to take in response to the comment.
  • Additional Report to Commenter: The commenter is external.
  • Notes: Context that may be helpful for the Leadership Council.
Comment ReferenceSpecification Reference(s)Editorial or TechnicalDispositionReport to CommenterNotes
#326Grant Sec 1.3EditorialEdit in commit Editorial improvement to a spec definition raised by a WG participantsuggested; discussed by several WG participants and consensus rapidly gained.
#327Grant Sec 3.3.6EditorialEdit in commit Simple editorial wording fix raised by a WG participantsuggested; discussed by several WG participants and consensus rapidly gained.
#328Grant Sec 3.3.4EditorialEdit in commit Interpretation issue raised by a WG participant; discussed thoroughly by the WG and an editorial enhancement removing ambiguity adopted by the WG.

#329

Grant 7.4.1EditorialEdit in commit Incorrect cross-reference raised by a WG participantnoted; fix applied without WG intervention required.
#330FedAuthz Sec 9.2 EditorialNo change Simple editorial correction raised by a WG participantsuggested; fix overcome by events (#334).
#331FedAuthz Sec 9.3EditorialEdit in commit Simple editorial correction raised by a WG participantsuggested; fix applied without WG intervention required.
#332Grant (various)EditorialNo change Interpretation issue raised by a (non-implementer) WG participant. A secondary commenter suggested adding clarifying wording; since a poll about the meaning among implementers on the WG produced a consistent interpretation, the WG decided not to change question raised; WG decided to keep the existing wording.
#333Grant Sec 3.3.6EditorialEdit in commit Simple editorial correction raised by a WG participantrequested; fix applied without WG intervention required.
#334FedAuthz Sec 1, FedAuthz Sec 9.2EditorialEdit in commit Interpretation issue raised by a WG participant; discussed thoroughly by the WG and an editorial resolution adopted by the WG involving removal of text.

#335a

Grant (various), FedAuthz (various)EditorialNo changeNOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub.
 Editorial improvement raised by an external commenter
YesEditorial improvement requested; editor recommended no change.
#335bGrant (various), FedAuthz (various)EditorialEdit in commitNOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub.
 Editorial improvements raised by an external commenter
YesEditorial improvements requested; small edits applied without WG intervention required.
#335cGrant Sec 1.3EditorialtbsNOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub.
  Yes
Editorial improvement to diagram(s) raised by an external commenterrequested; tbs
#335dGrant Sec 1.3EditorialtbsNOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub.
  Yes
Editorial improvement to diagram(s) raised by an external commenterrequested; tbs
#336FedAuthz Sec 5.1EditorialEdit in commit Editorial improvement suggested by a WG participantrequested; discussed by several WG participants and consensus rapidly gained.
#337aFedAuthz Sec 5.1.1EditorialEdit in commitNOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub.YesClarification requested by an external commenter; WG determined an editorial improvement.
#337bGrant Sec 3.3EditorialEdit in commitNOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub.YesClarification requested by an external commenter; WG determined an editorial improvement.
#337c,dGrant Sec 2, Grant Sec 3.3.2, Grant new Sec 7.3TechnicalEdit in commitNOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub.YesRequest for new mechanism for dynamic client registration mechanism and clarity by external commenter; WG agreed. Mechanism requires a registration request to IANA.
#337eGrant Sec 3.3.3EditorialEdit in commitNOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub.
 Yes
Simple editorial correction raised by an external commenterrequested; fix applied without WG intervention required.
#337fGrant Sec 3.3.4Editorial NOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub.Yes
 
#337gGrant (various)Technical NOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub.
 
#339    
#340  EditorialEdit in commitYesAdditional security considerations requested; WG agreed to add security a form of them that gives discretion to the AS.
#339FedAuthz Sec 4.1EditorialEdit in commit Clarification requested; WG determined an editorial improvement.
#340Grant Sec 3.3.6EditorialEdit in commit  
#341     
#342     
#343     
#344     
#345     
#347     
#348     
#349     
#350 Editorial   
#351     
#352