...
| Comment Reference | Specification Reference(s) | Editorial or Technical | Disposition | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #326 | Grant Sec 1.3 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Editorial improvement to a spec definition suggested by a WG participant; discussed by several WG participants and consensus rapidly gained. |
| #327 | Grant Sec 3.3.6 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Simple editorial alignment in wording suggested by a WG participants; discussed by several WG participants and consensus rapidly gained. |
| #328 | Grant Sec 3.3.4 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Interpretation issue suggested by a WG participant; discussed thoroughly by the WG and an editorial enhancement removing ambiguity adopted by the WG. |
#329 | Grant 7.4.1 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Incorrect cross-reference noted by a WG participant; fix applied without WG intervention required. |
| #330 | FedAuthz Sec 9.2 | Editorial | No change | Simple editorial correction suggested by a WG participant; fix overcome by events (#334). |
| #331 | FedAuthz Sec 9.3 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Simple editorial correction suggested by a WG participant; fix applied without WG intervention required. |
| #332 | Grant (various) | Editorial | No change | Commenter Interpretive issue raised by a (non-implementer) WG participant. A secondary commenter suggested adding clarifying wording after the fashion of RFC 6749 refresh token wording. Since a poll during UMA telecon 2017-07-20 of implementers on the meaning of the existing wording (including, implicitly, the commenter) effectively ; since a poll about the meaning among implementers on the WG produced a consistent interpretation, we the WG decided not to add any change the existing wording. |
| #333 | Grant Sec 3.3.6 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Simple editorial enhancement correction suggested by a WG participant, readily accepted by the WG; fix applied without WG intervention required. |
| #334 | FedAuthz Sec 1, FedAuthz Sec 9.2 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Interpretation issue suggested by a WG participant; discussed thoroughly by the WG and an editorial resolution adopted by the WG involving removal of text. |
| #335 | ||||
| #336 | ||||
| #337 |