Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

These minutes were approved on 4 August 2010.

1. Approve minutes

Frank moved to approve minutes of 6/23.
Approved without dissent.

2. Ballot review – Joni

Open ballot for the US Federal Privacy Profile and the FOG. As of 5:00 Tuesday, both carried. Both have been updated with appropriate headers and footers. Both docs can go for 45 day review and comment then go to the LC for review and approval or we can leave them at draft recommendation status.

Once the 45 days is over they go to the LC for ratification as final reports. If we believe there may be updates in the next few months we can hold at this point pending update prior to going to the LC.

Frank – my preference is to move them to final through the LC. We may have to make the ICAM doc changes based on the Government activity. Joni – I see no reason not to move forward. I would support moving forward. Frank – what is the next step? Joni – I help craft notices for each document and set up the comment forms for review. After the 45 day we gather comments and resolve. At close of the review we ask the LC to ratify as a final recommendation. If any updates they are mapped to the disposition of comments and move forward.

2. ISO Subgroup liaison –

Patrick – Serious confusion as a result of the SC27 briefing in Malaysia. Confusion as to what national participation is. Clouded because some national groups are not properly structured or aware of Malaysia results. I need to connect with Erika McAllister to identify the actual impact. I am too low on the structure to know what is up. Nigel Tedeschi is more aware. Would appreciate the reach out toe Judith Spencer. Frank -= on the subgroup itself, I know there has been traffic and that Colin, Richard and Shin form Japan reached out. Are you ok with participation? Patrick – yes but the next step is to determine exactly where we are with the transition through the process.

Frank – we can carve out time to give the group time to update and request what they might need from the larger IWAG. In addition we could do an off cycle telecon to handle other things.

Patrick will put a coordinating e-mail out after (UK panel has a meeting on 18 August so we won

  • No labels