DRAFT
Date
Attendees
See the Participant roster
Voting (4 of 7 required for quorum)
Participant | Attending | |
---|---|---|
1 | Chaudhury, Atef / Krishnaraj, Venkat | |
2 | Davis, Peter | |
3 | Hughes, Andrew | |
4 | Jones, Thomas | X |
5 | Thoma, Andreas | Regrets |
6 | Wunderlich, John | X |
7 | Williams, Christopher | X |
Non-Voting
Participant | Attending | |
---|---|---|
1 | Auld, Lorrayne | |
2 | Aronson Mark | |
3 | Balfanz, Dirk | |
4 | Brudnicki, David | |
5 | D'Agostino, Salvatore | |
6 | Dowtin, Jazzmine | |
7 | Dutta, Tim | |
8 | Flanagan, Heather | |
9 | Fleenor, Judith | |
10 | Glasscock, Amy | |
11 | Gropper, Adrian | |
12 | Hodges, Gail | |
13 | Jordaan, Loffie | X |
14 | LeVasseur, Lisa | |
15 | Lopez, Cristina Timon | |
16 | Pasquale, Jim | |
17 | Snell, Oliver | |
18 | Stowell, Therese | |
19 | Sutor, Hannah | |
20 | Tamanini, Greg | |
21 | Vachino, Maria | |
22 | Whysel, Noreen |
Goals
Check-in on work progress
Review draft outline and status of writing tasks
Discussion items (AKA Agenda)
Time | Item | Who | Notes | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 min. |
| Called to order: 13:05 Quorum reached: No Minutes to approve: Yes 2023-12-13 Meeting notes - Draft | |||||||||
5 min. | Open Tasks Review | All |
| ||||||||
5 min | Implementor’s Guidance Report has been published | Thanks to Amanda at Kantara. As promised, the PEMC report has been published on Kantara's Reports and Recommendations page. The direct link to the report is as follows: https://kantarainitiative.org/download/pemc-implementors-guidance-report/ | |||||||||
15 min | Yearly Administration Tasks | Leadership Elections Because quorum was not achieved, we agreed to distribute this as an email ballot, to be completed by
Nominations Chair: John Wunderlich Co-Chair: Christopher Williams Secretary: vacant Other nominations Results Chair: Co-Chair: Secretary: Charter Renewal Discussion: No reason for update raised. Last updated in mid 2023 | |||||||||
10 minutes | Requirements Report | Discussion of next phase, starting with a review of the draft requirements report.
Proposed workflow is the following: DRAFT When a requirement is first added to the Google Doc, it is in draft. SUBMITTED When a requirement is ready to be discussed by the group and is on the agenda for a workgroup meeting it is moved to submitted status at that meeting. A link to the meeting note or notes where the requirement is discussed is added to the requirement in the document. Also, individuals may take on tasks related to the requirement which will be tracked in the Google Doc. UNDER REVIEW Once a requirement has been discussed at a meeting, it is Under Review until the workgroup completes the discussion and changes to the requirement. When that is done the workgroup will vote or reach consensus that the requirement should either be included in the recommendation report or excluded. CANDIDATE Discussion on the requirement is complete and it will be part of the recommendation report. EXCLUDED Discussion on the requirement is complete and it will not be part of the recommendation report. | |||||||||
Adjourn | 13:27 |
Next meeting