Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

DRAFT

Date

Attendees

See the Participant roster

Voting (3 of 6 required for quorum)

Participant

Attending

1

Chaudhury, Atef

2

Jones, Thomas

3

Krishnaraj, Venkat

4

Thoma, Andreas

5

Wunderlich, John

6

Williams, Christopher

Non-Voting

Participant

Attending

1

Auld, Lorrayne

2

Aronson Mark

3

Balfanz, Dirk

4

Brudnicki, David

5

D'Agostino, Salvatore

6

Davis, Peter

7

Dowtin, Jazzmine

8

Dutta, Tim

9

Flanagan, Heather

10

Fleenor, Judith

11

Glasscock, Amy

12

Graaf, Irene

13

Gropper, Adrian

14

Hodges, Gail

15

Hughes, Andrew

16

Jordaan, Loffie

17

LeVasseur, Lisa

18

Lopez, Cristina Timon

19

Pasquale, Jim

20

Snell, Oliver

21

Stowell, Therese

22

Sutor, Hannah

23

Tamanini, Greg

24

Vachino, Maria

25

Whysel, Noreen

Goals

  • Check-in on work progress

  • Review draft outline and status of writing tasks

Discussion items (AKA Agenda)

Time

Item

Who

Notes

5 min.

  • Start the meeting.

  • Call to order.

  • Approve minute

  • Approve agenda

John Wunderlich

Called to order:

Quorum reached:

Minutes to approve:

2023-12-13 Meeting notes - Draft2024-01-03 Meeting notes - Draft

5 min.

Open Tasks Review

All

DescriptionDue dateAssigneeTask appears on
John Wunderlich2024-05-08 Meeting notes

Link to Recommendations (Commenter Link): Recommendations for Privacy Enhancing Mobile Credentials

15 min

Yearly Administration Tasks

Leadership Elections Results

Result of email ballot

Chair: John Wunderlich

Co-Chair: Christopher Williams

Secretary: Vacant

10 minutes

Requirements Report

John Wunderlich

Review of process being proposed to deal with requirements. (See link to Google Doc above)

  • DRAFT When a requirement is first added to the Google Doc, it is in draft.

  • SUBMITTED When a requirement is ready to be discussed by the group and is on the agenda for a workgroup meeting it is moved to submitted status at that meeting. A link to the meeting note or notes where the requirement is discussed is added to the requirement in the document. Also, individuals may take on tasks related to the requirement which will be tracked in the Google Doc.

  • UNDER REVIEW Once a requirement has been discussed at a meeting, it is Under Review until the workgroup completes the discussion and changes to the requirement. When that is done the workgroup will vote or reach consensus that the requirement should either be included in the recommendation report or excluded.

  • CANDIDATE Discussion on the requirement is complete and it will be part of the recommendation report.

  • EXCLUDED Discussion on the requirement is complete and it will not be part of the recommendation report.

If we proceed sequentionally, today’s discussion will be about

1.1 Selected Data Release

Adjourn


13:27

Next meeting

Action items

  •  

  • No labels