Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 2
Next »
Kantara F2F meeting Munich
Date and Time
- Date: 14, 4., 2012
- Time: 14:00 CEDT
Attendees
- Allan Foster
- Anna Ticktin
- John Bradley
- Keith Uber
- Leif Johansson
- Rainer Hoerbe
Apologies
- Conformance Testing, Full Matrix Test vs. test harness
Minutes
- Test harness (Geant fed lab): now being developed for OpenID/Connect. SMAL not available yet in the second version that separates backend and frontend. A new version of the test harness was developed for OpenId/Connect. The SAML-engine needs to be integrated into it.
- Test harness should be configurable for various deployment profiles (US, CA, FI, AT, ..)
- John: Scenario and deployment testing is more useful than testing of isolated functions, because the latter does not tell you if actual features really work.
- To use the fedlab test harness one has to instrument the proxy to get the feedback. Keith noted that he failed to do that.
- John: Can we get the resources together to put together the test cases needed for the Full Matrix test?
- Keith: There was no interest in developing test cases for the Full Matrix Test to test eGov 2.0 Interop profile.
- It seems to be reasonable to focus on the development of test cases for the test harness
- Future Full Matrix Tests could be conducted based on test harness infrastructure if there is demand; Uninett could be contracted for that.
- John says that a number of weeks would have to be invested to develop the eGov 2.0 test cases.
- Rainer says that the allocation of some modest budget to implement the tests for the Austrian eGov profile is likely to be awarded.
- Leif said he will establish a contact between Hedberg Roland working for G