Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

HIA WG Concall 2010-10-28 Minutes



Date and Time

  • Date: Thursday, October 28, 2010
  • Time: 10am PST | 1pm EST | 5pm UTC | 7pm CEST (Time Chart)
  • Dial-In: Skype: +9900827044630912 - North American Dial-In: +1-201-793-9022
  • Code: 4630912


Attendees

  • Dervla O'Reilly (non-voting)
  • Joni Brennan (non-voting)
  • Barry Hieb (voting)
  • Dan Combs (voting)
  • Laurie Tull (voting)
  • Art Moldavia (non-voting)
  • Bob Pinheiro (voting)
  • Peter Palmer (voting)
  • Dazza Greenwood (non-voting)
  • Rick Moore (voting)
  • Siddharth Bajaj (non-voting)

Apologies

Apologies - John Fraser, Lara Zimberoff

We had 6 voting members on the call where we did/did not reach reach quorum.

Agenda

1.       Roll

2.       Approve Minutes from Sept. 30, 2010

3.       Patient ID Pilot update/ architectural components

     a.       Funding

     b.       Project Status

     c.       Timeline, documents to expect

     d.       IAWG discussion

     e.       UMA WG

4.     Other business

5.     MITRE trusthub discussion

     a.       Diagram of eCitizen Patient identity pilot - https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0Bx6P0fy7aGmLNGIzZmY0ZTgtNDQ4YS00YmY0LWEwNzAtNTAyMzJhMjNmZmE2&hl=en


     b.       Trusthub on SourceForge - http://sourceforge.net/projects/trusthub/

Minutes

1. Roll Call and quorum and welcome new attendees

Roll call as above.

Minute taker: Lara Zimberoff.

2. Approve Minutes from previous meeting

John Fraser motioned to approve minutes, minutes approved with no objection

3.  Patient ID Pilot Update/ architectural components

Dan Combs: Earlier this week, Nat Nakamura was in town and we had a dinner, spoke for 2-3 hours about how to move forward with the project. Kantara has sent an agreement to the OpenID of Japan Organization and that information is being reviewed by their legal counsel. At this point, we are waiting for a response as to whether that document will be acceptable. That

  • No labels