Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 28 Next »

INCOMPLETE

This document records the User-Managed Access (UMA) Work Group's disposition of comments received during the Public Comment and IPR Review period for the UMA V2.0 Draft Recommendations.

Key:

  • Comment Reference: The GitHub repository issue number of the comment and possibly a reference to a subpart of that issue. All issues relevant to the Public Comment and IPR Review period use both the label "V2.0" and the label "public comment period". The content of all comments has been stored in GitHub.
  • Specification Reference(s): A reference such as "Grant Sec n.n" or "FedAuthz Sec n.n". "Grant" refers to User-Managed Access (UMA) 2.0 Grant for OAuth 2.0 Authorization revision 05 and "FedAuthz" refers to Federated Authorization for User-Managed Access (UMA) 2.0 revision 05, the Draft Recommendations under review. Note that issues relevant to each specification have been labeled "grant" and "fedauthz", respectively.
  • Editorial or Technical: Whether the comment involves an editorial change (generally a minor clarifying change to wording) or a technical one (generally a substantive change that may require extensive implementation work). Note that a label of "editorial" has been applied to issues that appear, at first blush, to be editorial.
  • Disposition: The Work Group's conclusion about the action to take in response to the comment.
  • Report to Commenter: Whether the commenter is external and requires reporting back of the disposition.
  • Notes: Context that may be helpful for the Leadership Council.
Comment ReferenceSpecification Reference(s)Editorial or TechnicalDispositionReport to CommenterNotes
#326Grant Sec 1.3EditorialEdit in commit Editorial improvement to a spec definition suggested; discussed by several WG participants and consensus rapidly gained.
#327Grant Sec 3.3.6EditorialEdit in commit Simple editorial wording fix suggested; discussed by several WG participants and consensus rapidly gained.
#328Grant Sec 3.3.4EditorialEdit in commit Interpretation issue raised; discussed thoroughly by the WG and an editorial enhancement removing ambiguity adopted by the WG.

#329

Grant 7.4.1EditorialEdit in commit Incorrect cross-reference noted; fix applied without WG intervention required.
#330FedAuthz Sec 9.2 EditorialNo change Simple editorial correction suggested; fix overcome by events (#334).
#331FedAuthz Sec 9.3EditorialEdit in commit Simple editorial correction suggested; fix applied without WG intervention required.
#332Grant (various)EditorialNo change Interpretation question raised; WG decided to keep the existing wording.
#333Grant Sec 3.3.6EditorialEdit in commit Simple editorial correction requested; fix applied without WG intervention required.
#334FedAuthz Sec 1, FedAuthz Sec 9.2EditorialEdit in commit Interpretation issue raised; discussed thoroughly by the WG and an editorial resolution adopted by the WG involving removal of text.

#335a

Grant (various), FedAuthz (various)EditorialNo changeYesEditorial improvement requested; editor recommended no change.
#335bGrant (various), FedAuthz (various)EditorialEdit in commitYesEditorial improvements requested; small edits applied without WG intervention required.
#335cGrant Sec 1.3EditorialtbsYesEditorial improvement to diagram(s) requested; tbs
#335dGrant Sec 1.3EditorialtbsYesEditorial improvement to diagram(s) requested; tbs
#336FedAuthz Sec 5.1EditorialEdit in commit Editorial improvement requested; discussed by several WG participants and consensus rapidly gained.
#337aFedAuthz Sec 5.1.1EditorialEdit in commitYesClarification requested; WG determined an editorial improvement.
#337bGrant Sec 3.3EditorialEdit in commitYesClarification requested; WG determined an editorial improvement.
#337c,dGrant Sec 2, Grant Sec 3.3.2, Grant new Sec 7.3TechnicalEdit in commitYesRequest for new mechanism for dynamic client registration mechanism and clarity; WG agreed. Mechanism requires a registration request to IANA.
#337eGrant Sec 3.3.3EditorialEdit in commitYesSimple editorial correction requested; fix applied without WG intervention required.
#337fGrant Sec 3.3.4Editorial Yes
 
#337gGrant (various)EditorialEdit in commitYesAdditional security considerations requested; WG agreed to add security a form of them that gives discretion to the AS.
#339FedAuthz Sec 4.1EditorialEdit in commit Clarification requested; WG determined an editorial improvement.
#340Grant Sec 3.3.6EditorialEdit in commit  
#341     
#342     
#343     
#344     
#345     
#347     
#348     
#349     
#350 Editorial   
#351     
#352     
  • No labels