Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Meeting Status Metadata

Quorum

QUORATE

Notes-Status

DRAFTING

Approved-Link

The meeting status metadata table is used for summary reports - copy the status macros from the table in these instructions:

Quorum: QUORATE NOT QUORATE

Notes-Status: DRAFTING READY FOR REVIEW APPROVED

Approved-Link: Insert a link to the Meeting Notes page holding the approval decision for this notes page

Agenda

  1. Administration:

  1. IAWG Actions/Reminders/Updates:

  2. ISO 17065 Discussion Items 

    1. not discussed

  3. Group Discussion (if any new material):  

(Not discussed on today’s call) SP 800-63B-section 5.2.3 (Use of Biometrics)-Jimmy’s email

  1. Agenda for next week

    1. Purpose & Scope discussion of the text

    2. Catch up on outstanding items

    3. Possibly conclude WG officer election

\uD83D\uDC65 Attendees

Voting:

Name

Organization

Present?

Donald, India

GSA

Y

Hughes, Andrew

FaceTec

Y

Jung, Jimmy

Slandala 

Y

King, Mark

N/A

Magrath, Michael

Easy Dynamics

Y

Rodriguez, Gabriel

BlueProviderz

Silberstein, Yehoshua

Notarize

Y

Stojkovski, Vladimir

CLEAR

Wilsher, Richard

Zygma Inc. 

Y

Nonvoting:

Dan Bachenheimer

Cynetheia Brown

Nathan Faut

Wendy Brown

Eric Thompson

Staff:

Carol Buttle (left early)

Guests:

Quorum determination

Meeting is quorate when 50% + 1 of voting participants attend

There are 9 voters as of 2025-02-06

Approval of Prior Minutes

Motion to approve meeting minutes listed in the agenda:

Moved by: Jimmy Jung

Seconded by: Mike McGrath

No objections noted. Motion carried.

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

Andrew Hughes

Charter update text discussion -

  • NOTE: Notes on our vigorous discussion are embedded in the draft for discussion document. It was a very good airing of views on the relationship and responsibilities expectations between the assurance program and IWAG; a discussion on how specific (or not) the charter should be; discussion about maybe reorganizing existing requirements so that they better match how existing service providers structure and deliver their offerings; discussion on what ‘assessable’ means; and so much more.

Next week’s call we will look at the text of the “purpose and scope” section.

✅ Open Action items

  •  

Action items may be created inline on any page. This block shows all open action items from all meeting notes.

Task report

Looking good, no incomplete tasks.

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels