(1) WG NAME (and any acronym or abbreviation of the name):
ANCR WG (Anchored Notice & Consent Receipt)
[ Standardised Record Framework for Consent Receipts and their use as verified claims in identifier management protocol based technical token ]
(2) PURPOSE:
Develop and contribute to standardised digital notice transparency in the 'digital commons', mandating the use of consensus protocol for specifying internationally interoperable data governance.
ANCR objective is to complete the Notice and Consent Receipt work with a conformance and compliance program. Contributing specifications according to this charter once incubated. Consent receipt derivative work is specified for (public accessible) ISO/IEC 29100 Security and privacy technique and the not open to access, ISO/IEC 29184 Online Notice and Consent Standard, where the Consent Notice Receipt Is published (Appendix B and Consent Standard). Demonstrating the Controller Notice record format that is used in the trust framework scheme.
This WG is chartered to specify for the digital commons, referring to the Council of Europe 108+, international privacy legal framework, to which the Consent Receipt v2. Consent Token Architecture and associated transparency conformance and compliance schemes are focused.
This works builds upon the Consent Receipt v1.1 and the ISO/IEC 27560 Consent Record Information Structure, which compliments it. Current request to ISO to make this open to access as well.
(3) SPECIFICATION COPE:
Required to:
(4) DRAFT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS: List Working Titles of draft Technical Specifications to be produced (if any), projected completion dates, and the Standards Setting Organisation(s) to which they will be submitted upon approval by the Membership.
Specifications in scope | Details | Dates | Contributed Towards |
---|---|---|---|
Anchor Receipt (Conformance and Compliance Transparency Performance Scheme of Notice) |
| January 2022 - start of group, expected 6-month effort. |
|
ANCR Record Framework | January 2023 | Contribution to Kantara ANCR: TPS Benchmarking Program | |
ANCR Controller Notice to Notary Credential | in progress | DTL - 0PN CI-Trust framework program | |
ANCR : Consent Receipt V2. Consent Token Record information Structure | Extension and completion of Consent receipt work contribution to Kantara by the Open Notice Project,. | DTL - 0PN CI-Trust framework program | |
AuthC | DTL Contributing to ANCR | in progress | DTL - 0PN CI-Trust framework program |
ANCR Consensus Protocol for | git based global digital stymergy | DTL - 0PN CI-Trust framework program | |
(5) DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: Other Draft Recommendations and projected completion dates for submission for All Member Ballot.
Name | Description | Link | Spec input summary | date reviewed |
Transparency Performance Conformity and Compliance Assessment Scheme 1, Part 1 and Part 2 | specifies 4 Transparency performance indicators, to produce a digital transparency record. |
(6) LEADERSHIP: Proposed WG Chair and Editor(s)
(7) AUDIENCE: Anticipated audience or users of the work includes
Regulators looking for technical controls to implement legal requirements that scale.
Trust Framework Providers,
Software developers, and product managers as a means of achieving interoperability across a wide range identity, security, and privacy of use cases. Developers of decentralized governance and next generation internet services.
Human beings, as the notice and consent receipts provide an alternative/complement to terms of services and privacy policies, and provides something that can be understood by people. This is in contrast to the current abuser experience, namely that privacy policies and terms of service address privacy concerns and provide safeguards of personal information.
Digital Privacy Operators, who are liable for identity, privacy, security, and consent systems in the real world.
(8) DURATION: Objective criteria for determining when the work of the WG has been completed (or a statement that the WG is intended to be a standing WG to address work that is expected to be ongoing).
The first phase is the completion of the whitepaper and in parallel the specification. As in the table above this is expected to take 6 months, but there is no proposed time limit on the group.
(9) IPR POLICY: The Organization approved Intellectual Property Rights Policy under which the WG will operate.
Kantara Initiative IPR Policy - Patent and Copyright, Reciprocal Royalty Free, opt out to RAND,
https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=41025689
(10) RELATED WORK AND LIAISONS: Related work being done in other WGs or other organizations and any proposed liaison with those other WGs or organizations.
Notice and Consent Task force at ToiP, DIACC, Kantara ISO BOT Liaison, aNG liaison, and W3C DPV among others. Numerous other previous activities and liaisons developed in the Kantara CIS WG. (now archived).
(11) CONTRIBUTIONS (optional): A list of contributions that the proposers anticipate will be made to the WG.
Codes of conduct and practice that adopt this work and its licensing.
(12) PROPOSERS: Names, email addresses, and any constituent affiliations of at least the minimum set of proposers required to support forming the WG. At least 3 proposers must be listed. At least 2 of the proposers must be Kantara Initiative Members - current members list
Proposers Name | Organization (or Individual) | Voting Member | Affiliations | |
Paul Knowles | paul.knowles [at] humancolossus.org | Human Colossus | x | ToiP-Inputs and Semantics WG |
Sal D’Agostino | 1dmach1n35 [at] gmail.com | Individual | x | Security Industry Association, ToIP, Kantara |
Mark Lizar | Mark [at] openconsent.com | OpenConsent | x | Trust Over IP Notice and Consent Task Force |