Kantara FI-WG Teleconference

Pending approval

Date and Time

Attendees

Agenda

  1. Roll call (QV group participation agreement) 
  2. Agenda bash
  3. Approval of 8/21 meeting minutes: https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/x/fwbnBg 
  4. SAML2int formatting edits
  5. Disposition column on the feedback page: https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/x/6IDJBg
  6. Review of outstanding issues in Github
  7. Any further work needed on feedback received so far

Minutes

  1. Roll call (QV group participation agreement) 
    1. Quorum achieved
  2. Agenda bash
  3. 130 is done, closed
  4. 134 AI: Scott - entity or role level - indentation - [DONE]
  5. 135: Scope at entity or role level - text explicitly says it’s allowed to be at either level. Could do indentation. Vlad was reading into the indentation. AI: Scott will look into this. - [DONE]
  6. Homework to all from last time to review this content and see if we can agree that it’s complete
  7. Additionally, what to do with Rainer’s feedback
  8. AIs for Walter, Alan and Eric
  9. Judith moved to accept
  10. Keith seconds
  11. Minutes approved
  12. Approval of 8/21 meeting minutes: https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/x/fwbnBg 
  13. SAML2int formatting edits
    1. Walter completed all on last week’s call except for one where there was a question to the list. 2.1 flattening not done AI: All/Walter
    2. Eric’s not done. AI: Eric [DONE]
    3. Alan’s stuff - status update? [DONE]
  14. Disposition column on the feedback page: https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/x/6IDJBg
    1. Any concerns about the disposition column?
      1. No concerns
    2. Discovery issue
      1. SP-23 is the only statement about discovery in the doc, not even a MUST.
      2. We’re going to make things worse by adding more language.
      3. This has always been the problem area of the doc. Maybe we should remove SP-23.
      4. Striking SP-23 not a good idea.
      5. To the extent you can define it, you want an inline discovery, rather than out-of-band via a URL.Example of a way to split the implementations, which is why Scott is getting uncomfortable having this in the doc. It’s not a deployment concern, it’s implementation.
      6. AI: Scott try to come up with something. Scott will send something to the list. Judith offers to help bounce ideas around.
  15. Review of outstanding issues in Github
    1. 120: AI: Eric dig up disposal of 120 from email, InCommon final report, send to list for review - DONE(?) modulo language re SHA-1 vs. SHA-2
    2. 25: Not sure this is still relevant. Close. [DONE]


Next Meeting

NOTE: Do not follow the code with a "#" symbol as it may cause the code not to be recognized.