Attendees:

Voting Participants: Mark King, Mark Hapner, Martin Smith, Ken Dagg.

Non-voting participants: Adam Cooper, Eric Thompson, Roger Quint

Guests: USPS – O. Reid-Christie

Staff: Colin Wallis

Apologies from JJ and Tim R.

Quorum: There was quorum.

Agenda

Administration:
Roll Call
Agenda Confirmation
Minutes approval 2021-04-22 DRAFT Minutes

2. Discussion

a. Criteria focused on Component Service Consumer.
b. Feedback on UK DCMS draft certification documents - Initial comments HERE (Deadline: May 7th)
c. Review and Comment: NIST open discussion issues in light of 800-63 rev.4 - IAWG is gathering comments HERE (Deadline: May 15th).
d. Review TSA RFI re mDL https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-04-19/pdf/2021-07957.pdf (Deadline: June 18th)

3. Any Other Business

Minutes Approval

2021-04-22 Minutes were approved as presented, without objection. Moved: Mark K. Seconded: Mark Hapner.

Criteria focused on Component Service Consumer.

Richard not present- skipping until next time.

Feedback on UK DCMS draft certification documents

Ken asks for comments on draft response. Summarizes our fairly general comments.
Ken asks for specific examples of inconsistent terminology.
Colin: thought the DCMS document was light, but not bad. They do lack refs to public standards, references to sources of content, cross-recognition
Ken generally agrees that document is not bad for this stage
Roger Quint asks if cross-recognition is not implicit; there is a ref to 17065, but Ken says goal and process for cross-recognition and certification process still ought to be more explicit.
Ken will capture today's comments and figure out how to get them in the required comment format. Will circulate to list in 1-2 days for comments; due on May 7th so hope to finalize before next meeting.

Review and Comment: NIST open discussion issues in light of SP 800-63 rev.4

Ken: any further thoughts from this group? Comments due in May.
Eric can't access Google doc, requests Ken pull up the document under discussion.
Colin asks about IAL1 (or IAL1-plus) requirement. Adam Cooper says this is in demand, especially in government.
Mark Hapner mentions what US IRS is doing to enhance ID verification. Separate channel (postal letter) and
Adam C. – examples of IAL use cases. Colin adds – useful as a "starter" level especially for consumers/public.
Roger Q – asks if there is a draft 63-4. Answer–not yet.
Further discussion of use cases, and definition of what "plus" might be, and whether that could be somewhat standardized.
Eric suggests that using the existing approach (what kinds of evidence – fair, good – and what combinations) could be used to standardized a 1-plus level. Adam says that would be useful.
Mark King: need to have a clearer "what will this accomplish" definition.
Ken will try to update comments in light of today's discussion.

Review TSA RFI re mDL

Next time, but briefly: Colin: today's discussion could play into a possible response to TSA. Believes Kantara will decide to make a response.

Next meeting May 6th -adjourned at 2:03PM

Browser not supported