User Terms Brainstorm and Scope

User Terms Brainstorm and Scope

User terms: brainstorm on tasks and scope:

  • User Terms name

    • "allowable uses"

    • "user submitted terms"

    • "terms of engagement"

    • "term negotiation"

    • Testing with user groups? marketing? who is our target?

    • potential for user terms to specify the kind of consent receipt they want?

  • UX / Product

    • work with end-users to determine means, understand and product market fit

    • work with parties who might offer user terms or receive user terms and respond

      • Commercial interest motivations for interactions with using system – making the commercial case

    • develop human readable language for each term name, definition

    • develop human meaning and pathways for choosing, reviewing and changing a term choice from MVP

    • Design beginnings: http://customercommons.org/2014/10/27/customer-commons-and-user-submitted-terms/

    • Define sensitive info?

  • Legal scope:

    • legal descriptions for each term

    • name and definition for each term

    • legal language for contract if terms offered and accepted

  • Engineering scope:

    • develop MVP scope for eng

    • machine readable description of each term

    • expression for names and definitions of terms

    • code or expression for sending and receiving a short list of terms

    • code for responding to a term request

    • Interaction with MVP CR

  • MVP

    • DNT? No 3rd party cookies / trackers? - Doc

    • Will we need some reply – consent receipts? - John

    • What about a DNT that is much more personal? - Doc

    • So "Block, and here are my prefs" - Mark

    • Whitelisting but personally held instead of centrally held - Doc

    • Place where terms live: MVP standard at CC and pointed to from Kantara / CISWG - Doc and Mary

    • Place where terms live for individual: local to user or is a blockchain for individual - Mary and Scott

      • Ex: when publishing a photo, the CC license and photo can be out in the world.. you just have the signal - Doc

      • Downside of broadcasting intent about terms may not work in all contexts - user prefs may not work in all instances, probably won't - Mark

      • Can we keep both contextual? - Mark

      • Where is the line for MVP and contextual? - Mary

      • Terms make more sense in the aggregate - Mark

    • Can't get stuck in worrying that server side can't yet respond, and yet there are some server side activities that want to respond but don't know how - Doc

    • Retail: shopping cart abandonment - John and Iain.. MVP could help

    • Some publishers are ready to drop 3rd party cookies and tracking immediately - Doc