2017-01-05 Meeting Notes (CR)

2017-01-05 Meeting Notes (CR)

Date

January 05, 2017

Status of Minutes

Approved at 2017-01-12 Meeting Notes (CR)

Attendees

Voting

 

Non-Voting

  • David Turner 

  • Colin Wallis

 

Quorum Status

Meeting was quorate.

 

 

Voting participants

Participant Roster (2016) - Quorum is 4 of 7 as of 2016-10-06

Iain Henderson, Mary Hodder, Harri Honko, Mark Lizar, Jim Pasquale, John Wunderlich, Andrew Hughes

Discussion Items

 

Time

Item

Who

Notes

Time

Item

Who

Notes

10 mins

  • Roll call

  • Agenda bashing

  • Meeting minutes approval

@Former user (Deleted)

 

  • "Move to approve listed meeting notes previously circulated"

    • Motion: Jim P.

    • Second: Mark

    • Discussion: None.

    • Result: Motion carried.

5 min

@Former user (Deleted)

  • Public review and IPR claims period starts <soon>

30 min

Discussion on what's next on the roadmap

All

  • (From December 1 2016 meeting)

  • The list of subject areas that will be worked on:

    • Consent Receipt

      • There will be CR spec errata that will need to be fixed

      • A v1.1 will be required within 6 months after feedback from implementers

    • User Submitted Terms

      • Use case library and elaboration of use cases

      • UX design

      • Model contract language to support each feature of the UST elements

    • Requirements for API / Interfaces for CR and UST artifacts

    • Requirements (text) for implementers of Consent receipt generators (code)

    • Requirements (text) for Consent receipt 'viewer' (code)

    • Information Sharing Agreements

      • Architecture and model (text and diagrams)

      • Requirements (text)

        • Business requirements

          • Functional requirements

          • Non-functional requirements

      • Specifications (text)

    • Build a Kantara prototype implementation of a consent receipt management system

New discussion 2016-01-05:

  • Digi.me has made adjustments to their approach - consent based versus permissioned access model (to be discussed on a future call)

  • The group discussed the draft mindmap of potential future org structures for this WG and also reviewed the current work list for 2017

  • The WG leadership team will review and refine before sharing with the broader list

5 min

Discussion about changing the CIS WG structure after CR v1.0

@Former user (Deleted)