2018-11-01 Meeting notes (CR)

2018-11-01 Meeting notes (CR)

Date

2018-11-01

Status of Minutes

Approved

Approved at: 2019-12-12 Meeting notes (CR) DRAFT

Attendees

Voting

 

Non-Voting

  • Tom Jones

  • Derek Munneke

  • Colin Wallis

  • Peter Davis

Regrets

  •  Chris Cooper

Quorum Status


Meeting was <<<>>> quorate

 

Voting participants

 

Participant Roster (2016) - Quorum is 5 of 9 as of 2018-07-12

Iain Henderson, Mary Hodder, Harri Honko, Mark Lizar, Jim Pasquale, John Wunderlich, Andrew Hughes, Oscar Santolalla, Richard Gomer

Discussion Items

Time

Item

Who

Notes

Time

Item

Who

Notes

4 mins

  • Roll call

  • Agenda bashing

@Former user (Deleted)

  • event updates

  • discuss Andrew's discussion papers about the road map

  • discuss ideas for EIC May 2018 demo and other talks

10 min

  • Organization updates

All

Please review these blogs offline for current status on Kantara and all the DG/WG:

There is a new wiki page that will hold all the known implementations of Consent Receipts - Please update the page or inform Andrew of your implementation.

  • Member plenary October 26 - update

  • IIW 2018B - update

  • CIAM World Europe - update

30 min

Roadmap ideas for Kantara CIS WG products

All

Continuation of the discussion about 'what should interoperate?'

Andrew has uploaded some material to help the discussion: Product Roadmap Ideas

Blog: Kantara Initiative Work Groups on Data Sharing and Consent

Mind map to go with the blog

Kantara consent high level use cases.pdf

 

0 min

Interoperable Consent Receipt roadmap ideas

All

From 2018-10-04 call:

  • If the legitimate basis is not 'explicit consent' - but rather legitimate interest, is the concept of 'data receipt' still viable?

  • Mark - yes, the current CR was designed to be not confined to 'explicit consent' - so yes, the receipt concept will work for other bases for processing

    • in particular - for updates to privacy notices

  • Mark Q: would it be interesting to have additional values for the 'consent type' field? A: YES! 

    • Jim: maybe this should go to the Consent Management WG?

  • A lawyer at the Seattle event pointed out that it would be useful to capture the actual privacy notice that was agreed by the user.

    • OpenConsent has an alpha product that might suit the purpose

    • There is a systemic problem that needs to be addressed - and capturing the privacy notice won't actually help

    • If there is a strong need for a high value receipt, then it would be very useful to capture the actual notice text

    • So maybe the receipt could have optionality to allow for capture of the notice text.

  • WG needs to take some time to discuss the UX - schedule it

    • Tom has posted some examples that could be discussed

    • Mark - OpenBanking has posted UX guidance

  • Schedule specific multiple calls for this to discuss what the user should see, and how this translates into the 'receipt' concept

    • Should this WG do a spec or guidance on UX or UI?

    • Should this WG talk about what the 'receipt' means and / or represents?

    • (YES to both question)

  • Andrew: suggests first design call on Thursday October 18, 2019 and then every 4 weeks to be kind to the down-under-ers.

Iain: the highest value work item is the lexicon work

5 min

Adding feature requests to next version of spec family

All

10 min

Product roadmap for the demo

All

  • Target is EIC May 2019

 

AOB

 

 

 

Next meeting

 

*** Next call 2018-11-08 10:30 am Eastern Standard Time / 15:30 GMT