Notes from 26 July 2012 P3WG teleconference

	File	Modified
Labels No labels Preview View	Microsoft Word Document P3WG Document Charter draft 18 May 2012.docx	Jul 27, 2012 by Former user

Participants

Voting

Non-voting

Apologies

Kantara Staff:

Notes:

1. Administrative:

Quorum was not achieved – 3 of 9 voting members were present during the roll call.
Co-Chair Colin Soutar requested that Anil John, GSA, and Aaron Brauer-Rieke, Center for Democracy & Technology, be changed to non-voting members. (Anil had previously requested this change.) Both members did not attend the last 3 plenary teleconferences.
There was a discussion regarding timing of the next plenary teleconference as several people will be at the face-to-face meeting in Crystal City on the 8th August – perhaps the 9th August call should be held on the 8th August to allow face-to-face participation.
ACTION: Co-Chair Colin Soutar will email voting members to determine the schedule for the next plenary teleconference.

2. Privacy Assessment Criteria

Ann Geyer gave an update on the progress of PAC. Progress is slow but steady. Ann suggested trying to get broader input via email.
Susan Landau requested an email update on the topic/paragraph that will be discussed during an upcoming ad hoc.
The group agreed that a link to the minutes and/or a brief description of the topic for discussion should be added to the emailed agenda for both the ad hoc calls and for the plenary calls.
Ann stated that the timeline for completion of draft PAC for WG review would be about 3 months, or the end of October.
ACTION: Ann will provide interim status report for the F2F in Crystal City.

3. Roadmap Discussion

The group discussed the participation/interaction of P3WG members with NSTIC. The group agreed that P3WG should request to Kantara leadership that P3WG be the group to formulate Kantara’s position for the Privacy Standing Committee within NSTIC.
The group agreed that privacy considerations regarding Relying Parties has highest priority for resolution, following completion of the PAC for the FICAM profile. This consideration of RP’s was deemed to be higher in priority than considering other national jurisdictions at this time.
Regarding the ISO liaison, the P3WG currently has an established liaison through the Kantara BoT Liaison sub-group with access to ISO documentation. There seems to be no need for further action at this time.
It was agreed that the topics that have been tabled by the P3WG ad hoc should be placed on the P3WG plenary agenda. Such topics include potential modification of the profile (which was deemed out of scope for the ad hoc on a previous plenary call) and other considerations that would fall under “Best Practices”, i.e. not in direct response to the current profile.
Colin Wallis suggested that P3WG members be invited to provide comments on ISO/IEC 29190 on the next call, in time to be considered for the next Kantara-ISO SC27 WG5 liaison statement. This topic will be on the agenda for next teleconference.

4. Face to Face meeting August 7/8

5. Future Presentations

Gershon Janssen, Secretary, OASIS Privacy Management Reference Model Technical Committee

OASIS Privacy Management Reference Model

5. AOB

Meeting ended at 11:50am EDT.

Browser not supported