Las Vegas, Sept 15, 2009
- Former user (Deleted)
- Prioritize/Assess Work Items
- eGov Profile - Consent Service
- Other
Possible Work Items:
- WS-* Harmonization
- OAuth
- eGov
- Possibly use of SSOS work in SAML TC
- "Keep on keeping on"
RESTful WSF?
- subsumed by OAuth work
API standardization?
- Consensus seems to be that would be another WG deliverable.
Debating Work Items:
- WS-* probably the most work
- Lot of political issues
- eGov work seems the least effort
- Consent service notion from Colin seems to be the new "Citizen Dashboard"
- Initial WSF profile for eGov would get a "foot in the door" for WSF
- eGov probably focused on on the federation/SSO layer, but starting
to look at attribute aggregation issues
- Lots of Euro govs using WSF internally, but need a mechanism to extend that
across borders
- OAuth use would imply products could switch out backplane with common API
- Asessing Need for External Interaction
- WS-*, / OAuth need a lot
- SSOS -> SAML TC needs some
- eGov little/none, just use case input
- What would the output of the eGov item be?
- A Kantara document? An SDO input?
- Conor: can't submit a profile without the specs it's based on
- The SAML 2.0 profile isn't headed anywhere, so this wouldn't
need to be either
- Is it useful absent a conformance program? Probably initially.
- End game may depend on the use cases input
- Anything is better than nothing, which is where we are today
- Robin: shouldn't we take a longer view to ensure they have a path forward?
- AS/SSOS
- Interest in producing a SAML equivalent in OASIS
- Difficult to do without copying ID-WSF, and without a submission, we can't
- If it was submitted, not clear it's within the SAML TC charter
- OAuth
- Not clear we have the right "hooks" into community
- IMI
- TC is open for business
- How do Infocard/IMI and WSF play together?
- Peter is vice chair