2021-08-19 DRAFT Meeting notes
- Martin Smith (Unlicensed)
Date
Attendees
Goals
- Per distributed Agenda
Discussion items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 min | Call to order 2:03PM | Former user (Deleted) |
| |
| 5 min | Roll call, Agenda confirmation | Former user (Deleted) | Quorate | |
| 5 min | Approval of DRAFT Minutes of June 3 and Aug 5 Meetings | Former user (Deleted) | Approved | |
| 10 min | Recent emails, meetings, updates, and brief discussions | All | Former user (Deleted)--PatientID Coalition. National Healthcare ID research prohibition revocation. Passed House; unknown in Senate. Might be a path to implement w/o Federal involvement. Former user (Deleted)Hope to be back to greater participation going forward. | |
| 30 min | FIRE workgroup update: User Experience draft paper (distributed as attachment to HIAWG meeting invitation email) | The intent of presenting this update to see its progress and make comments, but not significant changes, since the main author is Tom Jones who will determine the final utility of any edits. (See attachment, introduction, and link below) https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/index.php/User_Engagement This topic takes the concept of User Experience as a deep interaction with the user over time. The intent is to help Kantara plan for the next phases of development. Context: A proposal is in process to extend the Service Assessment Criteria for NIST SP 800-63 into a Trust Registry API for Mobile Applications that act as the User Agent. The existing proposal addresses the first phase of a user experience in acquiring a User Agent that will honor their intent. The next phase will be the development os specification to the current set of specification together into a complete package of all of the user attributes, and only those attributes that are required to establish and retain a relationship between one user and one relying party. (See Wiki for more....) | Former user (Deleted)– Intro. Like the idea. But worried that development that will mean something is under or funded by ONC. Not sure private efforts will be redundant. Have to be on the ONC working groups. Former user (Deleted)– We should add a "provider delegate" role. Doctors don't do the logged-on stuff. Former user (Deleted)every touch has to be documented. Would be great to "anchor" to a patient ID. Jim Kragh– For context, this is part of the overall project for which we're seeking funding from ONC. This piece to focus on patient experience "conops." Former user (Deleted)– Why is HIAWG reviewing this? Jim Kragh– good feedback for Tom J. – needs spell-check and clarifications. Former user (Deleted)– where does KI fit in? How does it relate to this doc? Former user (Deleted)– historically KI tries to harmonize the KI framework for use outside the Federal framework. Former user (Deleted)Healthcare is heavily regulated and the largest funder, so NIST standards are in effect mandatory. | |
| 5 min | Next Meeting/Conference call : September 2, and then 16, 2021 | Former user (Deleted) | Ended at about 2:40PM. | |