John Wunderlich to provide consolidated draft once comments have been received. Will determine if next meeting is 28 August depending on state of comments
First paragraph of Background, shows examples of federated models. SSI has very different meanings to different people, and some people do not consider mDL as SSI. A better example would be VCs. The point is that the issuer and the verifier are not the same; that’s covered by “federated”. Remove the parenthetical. Also, “These actions” is not clear as to what actions it refers to; replace with “IAM Activities”
Audience section: “Holders that should produce” should be “Providers that produce”
Out of scope: where does the “limiting the content” come from? It was a concern that the scope was creeping into the Issuer’s business. We do have something to say about what goes into the mobile credential, so the first sentence is not exactly correct. Suggest “for the purposes of a credential database when generated”? Perhaps “requirements on data collection and use for a mobile credential when issued”? We’re trying to get to the issuance access. Alternatively: “Anything not directly implicated in the provisioning or issuance of the credential is out of scope.”
there seems to be some concern about what is a credential at all and what it contains; is what the holder chooses to present its own credential, or is the credential the complete set of issued data, which the holder then chooses what to share out of that credential
Heather will make last little cleanups and send to the list with a comment with the fact that attendees of today’s call recommend this for adoption. We will vote on this next week.