DRAFT
Date
Attendees
See the Participant roster
Voting (4 of 7 required for quorum)
Participant | Attending | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chaudhury, Atef / Krishnaraj, Venkat | X |
| 2 | Davis, Peter | |
| 3 | Hughes, Andrew | |
| 4 | Jones, Thomas | X |
| 5 | Thoma, Andreas | |
| 6 | Wunderlich, John | X |
| 7 | Williams, Christopher |
Non-Voting
Participant | Attending | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Auld, Lorrayne | |
| 2 | Aronson Mark | |
| 3 | Balfanz, Dirk | |
| 4 | Brudnicki, David | |
| 5 | D'Agostino, Salvatore | |
| 6 | Dowtin, Jazzmine | |
| 7 | Dutta, Tim | |
| 8 | Flanagan, Heather | |
| 9 | Fleenor, Judith | |
| 10 | Glasscock, Amy | |
| 11 | Gropper, Adrian | |
| 12 | Hodges, Gail | |
| 13 | Jordaan, Loffie | |
| 14 | LeVasseur, Lisa | |
| 15 | Lopez, Cristina Timon | |
| 16 | Pasquale, Jim | |
| 17 | Snell, Oliver | |
| 18 | Stowell, Therese | |
| 19 | Sutor, Hannah | X |
| 20 | Tamanini, Greg | |
| 21 | Vachino, Maria | |
| 22 | Whysel, Noreen |
Goals
Check-in on work progress
Review draft outline and status of writing tasks
Discussion items (AKA Agenda)
Time | Item | Who | Notes | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 min. |
| Called to order: 13:05 Quorum reached: No Minutes to approve: 2023-09-20 Meeting notes - Draft2023-11-01 Meeting notes - Draft | |||||||||
5 min. | Open Tasks Review | All |
| ||||||||
5 min | Report on Vote | Voting should be complete for draft Implementor’s report. John Wunderlich I have to tabulate the votes tomorrow, to allow for any last minute votes for today’s deadline, but so far my impression is that the majority of the votes are Approve or Approve with Comments. Next steps:
| |||||||||
35 min | Requirements discussion | A: Is the process of eliciting requirements working? See the PEMC Requirments Coverage Sheet B: Start review of candidate requirements. Aim is to move requirements from “Submitted” to “Under Review” to “Candidate” or “Rejected”
| |||||||||
10 minutes | Other Business | ||||||||||
Adjourn | 13:21 |
Next meeting
Action items
- All workgroup members should review the draft report sent via email and vote on or before