You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 2
Next »
Date
2017-04-20
Status of Minutes
DRAFT
Approved at: <<Insert link to minutes showing approval>>
Attendees
Voting
Non-Voting
Discussion Items
Not enough attendees to conduct the meeting. Agenda items deferred to next week.
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|
| 4 mins | | Former user (Deleted) | |
| 1 min | | All | Please review these blogs offline for current status on Kantara and all the DG/WG: |
| 1 min | - Status of Consent Receipt Specification v1
| Former user (Deleted) | - All Member Ballot is now open - closes on Monday, April 24, 2017
|
| 15 min | - Discuss myData team comments
| Harri Honko | Note from prior meeting: myData EU-based lawyer commented that the CR v1.0 draft has elements that are based on UK/US Common Law, rather than civil codes (GDPR) |
| 10 min | - Recap the Discussion of approach
| All | - FROM 2017-03-23 MEETING NOTES:
- - discuss approach and schedule for next round of specification enhancements
- a contributions period
- a period of consolidation and combination of the contributions
- a period of WG Editor work
- Public review etc
- confirmation of change request tracking tool (GitHub Issues unless strong objection)
- Mary
- The caution about "Purposes lists" and "Sensitive data types" needs to be resolved - must be very cautious about how these are displayed to the user, especially if it's sensitive data - need to create recommendations
- Mark
- Need to set up a backlog - and define a work plan and schedule
- Set a date for CR v1.1
- Need to write guidance on spec usage
- Need consensus on
- Prioritization of backlog
- Need to consider any issues that are used for GDPR implementation
- The original agreement was to do 6-month epics
- Andrew to try to get the comments from the public review into github
|
| 30 min | Discuss work backlog priorities for CR v1.1 | All | Consent Receipt v1.1 Work Backlog - Discussed items 1-11 on the CR v1.1 backlog list
|
Parked notes about v1.1 approach from previous meetings:
- Mary
- The caution about "Purposes lists" and "Sensitive data types" needs to be resolved - must be very cautious about how these are displayed to the user, especially if it's sensitive data - need to create recommendations
- Mark
- Need to set up a backlog - and define a work plan and schedule
- Set a date for CR v1.1
- Need to write guidance on spec usage
- Need consensus on
- Prioritization of backlog
- Need to consider any issues that are used for GDPR implementation
- The original agreement was to do 6-month epics
|
| |