Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 46 Next »

INCOMPLETE

This document records the User-Managed Access (UMA) Work Group's disposition of comments received since the beginning of the May-July 2017 Public Comment and IPR Review period for the UMA V2.0 Draft Recommendations.

Key:

  • Comment Reference: The GitHub repository issue number of the comment and possibly a reference to a subpart of that issue. All issues relevant to the Public Comment and IPR Review period use both the label "V2.0" and the label "public comment period". The content of all comments has been stored in GitHub.
  • Specification Reference(s): A reference such as "Grant Sec n.n" or "FedAuthz Sec n.n". "Grant" refers to User-Managed Access (UMA) 2.0 Grant for OAuth 2.0 Authorization revision 05 and "FedAuthz" refers to Federated Authorization for User-Managed Access (UMA) 2.0 revision 05, the Draft Recommendations under review. Note that issues relevant to each specification have been labeled "grant" and "fedauthz", respectively.
  • Editorial/Technical: Whether the comment involves an editorial change (a change to interpretive wording, generally minor) or a technical one (a change to normative language that requires implementation work). Note that a label of "editorial" has been applied to issues that appear, at first blush, to be editorial. Note also that applying these categories itself requires interpretation, and there is some gray area between them.
  • Disposition: The Work Group's conclusion about the action to take in response to the comment. A "Commit" link goes to the GitHub commit showing the exact specification text change.
  • Report Out: Whether the commenter submitted comments through the official Public Comment period channel, and requires reporting back of the disposition.
  • Notes: Context that may be helpful for the Leadership Council.
Comment ReferenceSpecification Reference(s)Editorial/ TechnicalDispositionReport OutNotes
#326Grant Sec 1.3EditorialCommit Editorial improvement to a spec definition suggested; discussed by several WG participants and consensus rapidly gained.
#327Grant Sec 3.3.6EditorialCommit Simple editorial wording fix suggested; discussed by several WG participants and consensus rapidly gained.
#328Grant Sec 3.3.4EditorialCommit Interpretation issue raised; discussed thoroughly by the WG and an editorial enhancement removing ambiguity adopted by the WG.

#329

Grant 7.4.1EditorialCommit Incorrect cross-reference noted; fix applied without WG intervention required.
#330FedAuthz Sec 9.2 EditorialNo change Simple editorial correction suggested; fix overcome by events (#334).
#331FedAuthz Sec 9.3EditorialCommit Simple editorial correction suggested; fix applied without WG intervention required.
#332Grant (various)EditorialNo change Interpretation question raised; WG decided to keep the existing wording.
#333Grant Sec 3.3.6EditorialCommit Simple editorial correction requested; fix applied without WG intervention required.
#334FedAuthz Sec 1, FedAuthz Sec 9.2EditorialCommit Interpretation issue raised; discussed thoroughly by the WG and an editorial resolution adopted by the WG involving removal of text.

#335a

Grant (various), FedAuthz (various)EditorialNo changeYesEditorial improvement requested; editor recommended no change.
#335bGrant (various), FedAuthz (various)EditorialCommitYesEditorial improvements requested; small edits applied without WG intervention required.
#335cGrant Sec 1.3EditorialtbsYesEditorial improvement to diagram(s) requested; tbs
#335dGrant Sec 1.3EditorialCommitYesEditorial improvement to diagram(s) requested; added clarification to existing diagram after WG consultation.
#336FedAuthz Sec 5.1EditorialCommit Editorial improvement requested; discussed by several WG participants and consensus rapidly gained.
#337aFedAuthz Sec 5.1.1EditorialCommit Clarification requested; WG determined an editorial improvement.
#337bGrant Sec 3.3.3EditorialCommit Clarification requested; WG determined an editorial improvement.
#337c,dGrant Sec 2, Grant Sec 3.3.2, Grant new Sec 7.3TechnicalCommit Request for new mechanism for dynamic client registration mechanism and clarity; WG agreed. Mechanism requires a registration request to IANA.
#337eGrant Sec 3.3.3EditorialCommit Simple editorial correction requested; fix applied without WG intervention required.
#337fGrant Sec 3.3.4Editorialtbs Clarification requested; tbs
 
#337gGrant (various)EditorialCommit Additional security considerations requested; WG agreed to add a form of security considerations that gives more discretion to the authorization server than was requested.
#338FedAuthz Sec 3.2.1EditorialCommit Simple typo correction requested; typo fixed without WG intervention required.
#339FedAuthz Sec 4.1EditorialCommit Clarification requested; WG confirmed the correct interpretation and clarification text.
#340Grant Sec 3.3.6TechnicalCommit, commit, commit Change requested; WG ultimately reintroduced (and renamed) an UMA1 error code that was previously removed: was not_authorized, now called request_denied.
#341Grant Sec 3.3.6, Sec 5.6TechnicalCommit Change requested; WG made a different change, adding an optional new feature.
#342     
#343Grant Sec 3.3.6EditorialCommit Clarification requested; WG confirmed the correct interpretation and clarification text.
#344Grant Sec 3.3.6EditorialCommit Clarification requested; WG confirmed the correct interpretation and clarification text.
#345Grant Sec 3.3.6EditorialCommit Clarification requested; WG confirmed the correct interpretation and clarification text.
#346Grant Sec 3.3.4EditorialNo change Clarification requested; commenter decided to close own issue without action
#347Grant Sec 3.3.6EditorialCommit Change requested; WG gave the authorization server discretion to report the requested error.
#348Grant Sec 3.3.1, Sec 3.6, new Sec 6.1, FedAuthz Sec 1.4.1, Sec 8EditorialCommit Clarification requested; WG confirmed the correct interpretation and clarification text.
#349(see above)EditorialCommit Clarification requested; WG confirmed the correct interpretation and clarification text. (See #348 for details.)
#350Grant Sec 3.3.4EditorialCommit, commitYesClarification requested; WG confirmed the correct interpretation and clarification text.
#351FedAuthz (various)EditorialCommit Variety of editorial comments, typo corrections, and the like made; implemented without WG intervention required. Note that the original form of the text in Sec 3.2, since corrected, could have led implementers astray, implying that a field was required when it was clear in a different context (Sec 3.2.4) that the field would not appear.
#352FedAuthz Sec 1.4.1, Sec 1.5EditorialCommit Change requested; WG made some clarifications instead.
  • No labels