Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Attendees


Don Campbell, Medallies

Peter Alterman, SAFE-BioPharma 

Ann West, Incommon

Russ Weiser, Zentry

Ken Crowl, Experian 

Tom Barton, Incommon

Colin Wallis, KI

Matthew Williams

Paul Grassi, NIST

Mike Garcia, NIST

David Temoshok, NIST

Kevin Morooney, Incommon

Ruth Puente, KI


SAFE Update 

  • Revising their policy procedures to align with 800-63-3, but still not adopting permanent changes as they are waiting to see how FICAM intends to incorporate the new guidelines in their procedures.
  • They have another European qualified CA. 
  • Other document updates, working with the vendors on the draft for infrastructure services that circulated for comments a few months ago.

Incommon/Internet2 Update 

  • They continue working on the baseline expectations implementation plan. 
  • Gathering feedback on the strategy and reaction to 800-63-3 and considering possible path forward.


Kantara Initiative Update 

  • Working on the 800-63-3 project plan, which includes development of assessment criteria to the requirements. 


NIST Update 

  • Form of errata in the 2 weeks. No change in the requirements, editorial changes.

    Naming the

    OID of e-gov. KI SAML profile approved for some gov services, creating a vector of trust profile for US T based transactions.

     

    Profiles

    Vector of trust

     

    Guidance on 800-63-3

    Approaching winter, a draft up.

     


Open Mic 

4.3 Phase 3: Business Case & Sponsor Presentation           10

interesting to Incommon were federating to any federal agencies using a TFP, our campuses are federating with federal agencies.

Business case was for TFP to present to FICAM or is it FICAM view of what the business case should be back to us?

 

Strong Justification for Business or sponshorhip but he client of the TFP will have more strong relationship.

 

4.4.3 assessment methodology .

4.4.3 Credential Service Provider Assessment Methodology 11

 



  • No labels