Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees:

Voting Participants: Mark King, Mark Hapner, Martin Smith, Ken Dagg. 

Non-voting participants: Adam Cooper, Eric Thompson, Roger Quint, Pete Palmer

Guests: Jeff Tackes, USPSUSPS – O. Reid-Christie

Staff: Colin Wallis

Apologies from Eric Thompson and Richard Wilsher. 

Quorum: 3 out of 5.   There was quorum.


Agenda

Administration:
Roll Call
Agenda Confirmation
Minutes approval 2021-04-22 DRAFT Minutes

...

3. Any Other Business


Minutes Approval

Martin suggested an edit and the minutes were amended accordingly. 2021-04-22 DRAFT Minutes  were approved by motionas presented, without  objection. Moved: Mark K.  Seconded: Mark Hapner. Unanimous Approval


Criteria focused on Component Service Consumer.

  • R. Wilshire not present-- skipping for now


Feedback on UK DCMS draft certification documents - Initial comments HERE (Deadline: May 7th)

  • Ken asks for comments on draft response.  Summarizes our fairly general comments.
  • Ken asks for specific examples of inconsistent terminology.
  • Colin:  thought the DCMS document was light, but not bad. They do lack refs to public standards, references to sources of content, cross-recognition 
  • Ken generally agrees that document is not bad for this stage
  • Roger Quint asks if cross-recognition is not implicit; there is a ref to 17065, but Ken says goal and process for cross-recognition and certification process still ought to be more explicit. 
  • Ken will capture today's comments and figure out how to get them in the required comment format. Will circulate to list in 1-2 days for comments; due on May 7th so hope to finalize before next meeting.


Review and Comment: NIST open discussion issues in light of SP 800-63 rev.4

  • Ken: any further thoughts from this group?  Comments due in May. 
  • Eric can't access Google doc, requests Ken pull up the document under discussion. 



Review TSA RFI re mDL 


Others 

  • .