...
• Ken mentioned the problems of Ontario Canada, they asked for input. It is aligned with and influenced by the Pan-Canadian Trust Framework.
• Ken provided a brief overview of the package.
• Mark K. said it is in many ways similar to the Scottish one, except the Scottish one was on YouTube and this one is saying that the email is confidential. He asked why it cannot be discussed with other people.
• Ken Ken offered to ask them about it.
• Ken pointed out that they should not just look just at successes but look at all other government systems that have been implemented for their timing and scopes and learn from both, successes and those that have not been that successful.
• Martin said that he looked at the document and he has some comments. First, there is one abbreviation that has not been previously defined. Second, when they talk about achieving trust, they are talking about making sure there is a real person in the world. It is not the actual purpose of the framework. He noticed that in their use cases there were government and private use, all of their use cases deal only with government services. Martin wonders if he misunderstood the scope.
• Ken asked whether if there are comments regarding business model perspective.
• Martin commented he would say the government is going to have the answers and that is fine, but his opinion is that the government wants to make special provisions for those things and the government needs to pay for those who cannot pay.
• Mark K. argued it is significantly different when it comes to contract. He clarified that you do not get a contract when something is for free.
• Ken expressed he is not sure what the credential is in this.
• Ken asked where they are going to get their credentials, he has no answer to that question.
• Mark K. asked what the Federal Government is going to provide. Ken answered there are two levels of government.
• Ken announced the document will be up 5 o’clock easter time.
...