Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Expressing criteria related to the specific needs of the assurance domain (e.g. Identity, Attributes, Privacy, …);
  • Expressing requirements and qualifications for assessors (of subject entities’ conformity to the above-referenced criteria);
  • Supporting profiles for conformity in specific manners.

2.  Process description for the receipt and handling of applications for assessor accreditation and service assessment, and the subsequent publication of successful application statuses.

3.  Pro formae for applicants, with regard to the above.

4.  Governance requirements for the oversight of approved assessors and services/entities.
5.  Overall document explaining the interplay between all of the above and guidance for their application for specific purposes.

  • Depending upon how the detail work progresses and reviewer feedback, these deliverables may constitute separate free-standing documents or be a single work with multiple
  • John : this could be seen as a conflict with NSTIC objectives because of commercial interests

DRAC---this item pertains to multiple work groups, namely IAWG and P3.

  • IAWG will point back to PAF for privacy components

3.  IAWG Roadmap

  • Reallocation of unused WG funding
  • NEILL : European Commission is not in the business of creating standards.
  •  Question : would the EC really want to reinvent the wheel and not leverage community work? And the EU is running at a very slow pace.
  • ACTION ITEM 20110525-01 MYISHA — budget request / proposal to LC for RAF / DRAC funding

4.      AOB

Adjourned