Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Roll Call
  2. Approve 2011-08-31 minutes
  3. PIDS ?Presentation (30 minutes)
  4. 2012 budgets / budget allocation requests
  5. Group shut down for Identity & Access Services WG & EUM DG - LC to vote in favor
  6. PIDS Presentation (30 minutes)
  7. LCTFSC (20 minutes)
    1. WG / DG & community update on relevant TFW developments and activities in order to script / align Kantara Strategy
    2. Outline the TFSC roadmap for Kantara efforts into Q4 (and Q1?)
  8. Group-specific matters
  9. AOB - new Confluence Home Page - reference this page: http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/GI/NEW+TEST+CONFLUENCE+HOME+PAGE+MOCK+UP

...

Quorum is 6 of 11 as of 13 July 2011.

  1. TBD

Staff:

...

  1. Identity Assurance: represented by Myisha Frazier-McElveen
  2. User Managed Access: represented by Eve Maler
  3. Healthcare Identity Assurance: represented by Pete Palmer
  4. Federation Interoperability: represented by John Bradley
  5. Privacy & Public Policy: represented by Anna Slomovic
  6. eGovernment: represented by Colin Wallis
  7. Telecommunications Identity: represented by Gael Gourmelen

Staff:

  1. Dervla O'Reilly
  2. Joni Brennan
  3. Anna Ticktin

Secretary:

  • TBDLara Zimberoff

Not in attendance:

  1. Identity Assurance:

...

  1. TBDRich Furr (apologies)
  2. Healthcare Identity Assurance: John Fraser (apologies)
  3. Telecommunications Identity: Jonas Hogberg (apologies)

Non-voting:

  1. Attribute Management DG: represented by Sal D'Agostino
  2. Information Sharing: represented by Joe Andrieu
  3. Guest from eCitizen:

...

  1. TBDDan Combs
  2. Guest from eCitizen: Dazza Greenwood
  3. Guest from eCitizen: Daniel Bennett

Roll Call

Minutes

Approve 2011-08-31 minutes

Motion: xx Collin Wallis moves, xx Eve Maler seconds:

Passed by xx unanimous consent.

2012 Budgets / Budget Allocation Requests

Group Shut Downs

Identity & Access Services WG

Motion: xx moves, xx seconds:

2011-09-14-B

Initiate Shutdown of Identity & Access Services WG

Passed by xx consent.

EUM DG

Motion: xx moves, xx seconds:

2011-09-14-C

Initiate Shutdown of EUM DG

Passed by xx consent.

PIDS Presentation

LCTFSC

Group Specific Matters

AOB

Next Meeting

...

PIDS Presentation

Dan Combs: Phase 1 of project is to design an open architecture to enable. Healthcare is currently in the process of going digital. There is a critical gap in patient identity in the healthcare sector, which PIDS has been created to fill, particularly the fulfillment of Meaningful Use criteria. We believe that there is a big payoff for the Kantara organization in developing and supporting this project, and putting its stamp on the identity sector within healthcare. Jeremy Grant participated in an event for NSTIC at MIT, and he said that he gets asked a lot where NSTIC could make the biggest difference and that his answer is always healthcare. There is a need in healthcare for something like PIDS. We have reached a point where we are at the tail end of phase 1, which is gathering input and creating the architecture for a 1.0 version of a PIDS design. We are now onto version 0.8.

There has been a lot of exposure of the PIDS projects at various events and to various groups via presentations. We are currently scheduling for upcoming events with HIMSS and at various universities.

Dazza Greenwood: That brings us to the present. As Dan said, we are near the end of phase 1. Following phase 1 will be phase 1.5, between design and provisioning the resources to implement and promote what we are proposing. What we are proposing is that in phase 1.5, we create a more detailed set of specifications such as wire frames, site paths, screenshots, etc. to articulate what the resource will look like. We would also identify and get letters of intent for those that are interested in participating, such as groups that are interested in implementing PIDS. We would also establish and conclude our relationship with our implementers. Vendor, relying party, and identifying provider, and government outreach is extremely critical. In phase 1.5, we will also create and manage some proofs of concept in order to better lead us into phase 2.

Dan Combs: The intent is that 1.5 will bring us into phase 2, which is the actual building of PIDS. We are hoping that we will be able to build 2 or 3 implementations so we can then demonstrate interoperability and go through the appropriate test and certification process.

John Bradley: When will report on phase 1 of the project be available?

Dan Combs: One month. We