Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

#ParticipantAttending
1Davis, Peter
2D'Agostino, Salvatore
3Hodges, Gail
4Hughes, AndrewRegrets
5Jones, Thomas
6Krishnaraj, Venkat
7Thoma, Andreas
8Williams, ChristopherRegrets
9Wunderlich, JohnYes

Non-Voting

...

TimeItemWhoNotes

Start the meeting. Call to order, check a

10 min.Open Tasks Review

All

Task report
spacesPEMCP
labelsmeeting-notes

5 min.Draft Report Discussion

Current Version and comments: Drafts and Comments


Discussion: Pending the next draft

John Wunderlich Next draft of early implementor's report



Tasks:

20 min.Requirments Review

Proposed Review Process

  • Submit (any person can submit a requirement for consideration using the template (See How to create a requirement). The WG will set the status of the requirement will be set to to
    Status
    titleSubmitted
  • Review: At each scheduled meeting of the group, it will discuss one or more requirements will be discussed and , at which point attendees can make suggestions for revisions may be made. After the meeting, the status owner of the requirement should be changed to 
    Status
    colourBlue
    titleReviewed
    or the chair should change the status of the requirement to.
  • Revision: The proponent/author of the requirement or a person designated by the WG will revise the requirement following the meeting and, when complete, will change the status of the requirement to 
    Status
    colourYellow
    titleRevised
  • Candidate: After revision, the requirement will come back return to the WG for discussion. Depending on the results of the discussiondebate, the status of the requirement may will be set to one of the following:
    • Status
      colourBlue
      titleReviewed
      Sent back to review for another round of revision
    • Status
      colourGreen
      titleCandidate
       If If the group feels that the requirement is 'done,' , the status will be set to Candidate - meaning that it will be considered for the recommendation report (we won't know for sure until all the candidates are ready and the WG can see them as a group)
    • Status
      colourRed
      titleNot Included
      If the group feels that, after revision, the requirement is out of scope or is otherwise inappropriate for inclusion in the recommendation report, the status will be changed to Not Included.

The requirements' status will be maintained on the Candidate Requirements page


Other Business


5 min.Adjourn
Next Wednesday will be the Leadership Council, so the next meeting of the WG will be in two weeks

...