Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

DRAFT


Date

Attendees

See the Participant roster

Voting (5 of 9 required for quorum)

#ParticipantAttending
1Davis, Peter
2D'Agostino, Salvatore
3Hodges, Gail
4Hughes, Andrew
5Jones, Thomas
6Krishnaraj, Venkat
7Thoma, Andreas
8Williams, Christopher
9Wunderlich, JohnYes

Non-Voting

#ParticipantAttending
1Aronson, Marc
2Balfanz, Dirk
3Chaudhury, Atef
4Brudnicki, David
5Dutta, Tim
6Fleenor, Judith
7Glasscock, Amy
8Gropper, Adrian
9Jordaan, Loffie
10LeVasseur, Lisa
11Lopez, Cristina Timon
12Snell, Oliver
13Stowell, Therese
14Tamanini, Greg
15Vachino, Maria
16Whysel, Noreen

Other attendees


Goals

  • Check-in on work progress
  • Review draft outline and status of writing tasks

Discussion items (AKA Agenda)

TimeItemWhoNotes

Start the meeting. Call to order, check a

10 min.Open Tasks Review

All

5 min.Draft Report Discussion

Current Version and comments: Drafts and Comments


Discussion: Pending next draft

John Wunderlich Next draft of early implementor's report



Tasks:

20 min.Requirments Review

Proposed Review Process

  • Submit (any person can submit a requirement for consideration using the template (See How to create a requirement). The status of the requirement will be set to SUBMITTED
  • Review: At each scheduled meeting of the group one or more requirements will be discussed and suggestions for revisions may be made. After the meeting, the status of the requirement should be changed to REVIEWED.
  • Revision: The proponent/author of the requirement or a person designated by the WG will revise the requirement following the meeting and, when complete, will change the status of the requirement to REVISED
  • Candidate: After revision, the requirement will come back to the WG for discussion. Depending on the results of the discussion, the status of the requirement may be set to
    • REVIEWED Sent back to review for another round of revision
    • CANDIDATE If the group feels that the requirement is 'done', the status will be set to Candidate - meaning that it will be considered for the recommendation report (we won't know for sure until all the candidates are ready and the WG can see them as a group)
    • NOT INCLUDEDIf the group feels that, after revision, the requirement is out of scope or is otherwise inappropriate for inclusion in the recommendation report, the status will be changed to Not Included.

The requirements' status will be maintained on the Candidate Requirements page


Other Business


5 min.Adjourn
Next Wednesday will be the Leadership Council, so the next meeting of the WG will be in two weeks

Next meeting

 

Action items

  • No labels