Administration:
Roll call, determination of quorum. The meeting is not quorate.
Voting- Zaid Al Bukhara, Jimmy Jung, Mark King, Richard Wilsher
Non-voting-Mike Magrath
Staff-Amanda, Kay
Invited Guests-Lisa Balzereit
Minutes approval
Kantara Updates-potential handoff of Denny’s role on IAWG due to RBC request
Events
Karyn will be at Think Digital Identity for Government, October 10th, London. Kay is speaking on a panel.
Kay will be at Identity Week Asia, November 7th-8th, Singapore.
Alison and Kay will be at Future Identity Festival, November 13th-14th, London.
November/December-BoD elections (open to all organizational members–possible change to include individuals). Likely not made before this election. Governance updates are happening.
Annual General Meeting: December, possibly the 5th/6th–any conflicts?
Global Justice Advisory Committee-advising DOJ regarding standards. Kay has been in conversation with them that they should be certified with IAL2.
Assurance Updates:
Kay, Maria, and David’s fireside chat at Identity Week America: Expectations of more emphasis on equity in future revisions, but details are not available.
Kay also presented on DEIA at Identity Week America, and had a busy table and a roundtable discussion. Good combo of feds and vendors.
GSA has been talking about establishing a schedule of vendors with Kantara certifications (KI cert is a requirement to get on the schedule).
Richard proposed “digitally signing” the trust list-hand off details to Amanda/Kay.
Mark King: News from UK-RTR–most providers have chosen to go to the cheapest CB.
Discussion:
CO_SAC Updates: Richard’s updated analysis (an additional note on CO#0050), linked here
We would still be requiring this point, but it makes more sense to locate it in #0090. Jimmy supports this point.
Any Other Business
Follow up discussion to Richard’s email on September 26th, 2023 regarding 63B #1900:
Sub-clause D was eliminated on an earlier IAWG call.
After further consideration, Richard now recommends a minor tweak to the main clause and the retainment of sub-clause D, as the clause actually requires the CSP to respond to a legal instrument requiring that they revoke, so it should be retained. Changes as noted below (purple text signifying minor differences in main clause):
...