Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date and Time

Agenda

  • Roll
  • IPR
  • Minutes  Approval 
  • Agenda Approval
  • Agenda Items Discussion
    • Actions pending
    • Actions new
  • AOB


Minutes

Roll call

Salvatore D'Agostino (Unlicensed)

vitor jesus (Unlicensed)

Mark Lizar (Unlicensed)

PeterD (Deactivated)an Lundquist


IRP Policy Announcement


Quorum was 4 of 5

Approve minutes

  • Will wait for updated minutes from 20210203
  • 20210224 Mintues accepted


Small, bite size chunks of delta, structure of core receipt.

Header is the notice component w/controller identity

Legal justifiction then 

Consent notice receipt is the base max schema, which is requirement for 1.2

Then extensible by receipt type, interest notice, contract notice.

Action Narrative

Action delta 1.1. and open issues

Admin Workflow

Blog Post

  • Workgroup up and running
  • Formalize work plan
  • Expand group participation, open to all
  • ISO input


Intros...

PeterD (Deactivated)


Review of receipt fields. Everyone should review spreadsheet which is in the files folder 

https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/WA/File+lists 

Is 1.2 going to be compatible vs. a 2.x, supporting prior version is not a requirement

Shared 27560 fields and categories

Comment that V.next should begin to consider requirements for active notice

PeterD (Deactivated) as an implementer of 1.1. the extensions added in their use case includes time boundaries, association w/terms and use and conditions, as well as privacy policy, semantics around the publication date of the document. Is it possible to get the example from their schema. "On deck is the way back machine for the privacy policies."

Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) on boarding of privacy policy for broadcasting.

Discussion of use cases and the need for each of the fields to support the use case.

Suggestion to make use of the JWS (and JOSE) for the related crypto operations.

Need to consider how we address differences in credential technology, e.g. distributed ledger, vs. others. 

Ongoing discussion of legal vs. technical.  Critical update area as legal justification is a gap in 1.1.

Workbook 

editable spreadsheet for review: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rxF6yym3CGUgtt-AWbrShpazULkSGj9TH1hPxzaF9h8/edit?usp=sharing 


Calendar Update




(draft)

End of March informal freeze specification and fields, also determine areas for later work, not included in current specification publication.

Early-Mid April (draft for ISO consideration during next comment period)

End of April draft for circulation 

End of May consolidate comments

End of June publication

Need to coordinate (and determine) ISO 27560 comments and drafts schedule with that of the workgroup.

Determine any resources we need to support the workgroup and specification publication.

Discussion of election process, desire to have WG leadership roles apart from Chair, Vice-Chair, Secretary, Editor. Open to adding these as the opportunity arises.



As of 17 February Quorum is 3 of 5.