Discussion on PDURF - content focused discussion continued
1. Comments that need to be incorporated for inclusion in Andrew's suggested route; 2. Comments that belong to the more substantial discussion of the alternate route.
Group discussion on a number of issues (if you are reading this, please email Kate Dowling Former user (Deleted)or make changes to reflect your actual comments:
The framework is intended to be a set of options that a profile writer can use to create a profile.
jim pasquale asks if the meeting can be recorded. No objections, so recording starts with Former user (Deleted) introducing the data model and the role of frameworks.
Actual receipts are issued based on profiles.
The data model is intentionally broad and generic
Framework rules should be permissive and suggestive. The framework is too broad and generic to issue a receipt on purpose.
Profiles MAY be contributed to the WG, but not required.
Joe Andrieu will be invited to the next meeting to talk about the data model, hopefully after reviewing feedback and comments on the contribution.
New Business
All
jim pasquale announces that Kate Dowling that Former user (Deleted)has volunteered to be the Recording Secretary starting with the next meeting of the WG.
Not possible change IPR midway through the WG activity
Also not possible to have a dual-IPR regime in a single WG
A new WG can be started with the desired IPR (P&C opt-out to RAND) which would require a significant effort on staff to get approval for work under current IPR to new IPR - very heavy lift.
A new IP option would take a business case, community consideration, 45-day public comment, and an all-member ballot - several months.
Taking the existing work elsewhere requires an explicit license granted by Kantara.
Next meeting
All
*** Next call 2020-11-05 10:30 amEastern DAYLIGHT Time