Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Kantara ISI WG Teleconference

Date and Time | Attendees | Apologies | Agenda | Minutes | Next Meeting

Date and Time

  • Date: 08
  • Time: 10:30 Eastern Time

Attendees

Participant Roster - As of 2020-02-20, the quorum is 6 of 11

(Voting participants are: Andrew Hughes  iainh1 NA (Unlicensed), jim pasquale, John WunderlichKen Klingenstein (Unlicensed), Former user (Deleted)Mark Lizar (Unlicensed), Former user (Deleted)Former user (Deleted), Salvatore D'Agostino, Former user (Deleted) )

Voting

Non-Voting 



Apologies



Agenda

  1. Call to order
  2. ISI Work Group IPR Policy
  3. Approval of Agenda
  4. Approval of Minutes 10/15
    1. Action Items arising from minutes
  5. Work Group Discussion & Decision Items
    1. Discussion on PDURF - content focused continued
    2. 1. Comments that need to be incorporated for inclusion in Andrew's suggested route;
      2. Comments that belong to the more substantial discussion of the alternate route.
  1. New Business
  2. Next Meeting:  
  3. Adjournment

Minutes

Item

Who

Notes

Call to Order

Check for a quorum. Quorum achieved.

Reminder about attendance policy for voting status.

ISI Work Group IPR Policy

A reminder of IPR policy for the WG
Approval of Agenda

Approved

Approval of Minutes

2020-09-24 Meeting Minutes ISI WG

2020-10-01 Meeting Minutes ISI WG

2020-10-08 Meeting Minutes ISI WG

Discussion: None

Changes: None

Carried

Actions arising:

Project Updates (Month-end Updates) (not required this meeting)

  • AdvCIS
  1. Deliverables
    1. ?
  2. Status:
    Status
    colourGreen
    titleActive
  3. Issues:
    1. ?
  4. Next Steps:
    1. ?
  • Intentcasting
  1. Deliverables
    1. Report on Intentcasting
  2. Status:
    Status
    titleInactive
  3. Issues:
    1. Resourcing
  4. Next Steps:
    1. Resume in October
  • Personal Data Use Receipt Framework
  1. Deliverables
    1. ?
  2. Status:
    Status
    colourGreen
    titleActive
  3. Issues:
    1. Draft report comments and review
  4. Next Steps:
    1. ?
  • Privacy-Preserving Information Sharing
  1. Deliverables
    1. Survey Report
    2. Recommendation Report
  2. Status:
    Status
    titleInactive
  3. Issues:
    1. Insufficient availability to proceed at this point
  4. Next Steps:
    1. Find a new lead to move the project forward OR
    2. Resume when available

WG Discussion

  • Personal Data Use Receipt Framework

jim pasquale Provided an overview

Former user (Deleted) Continued the walkthrough of the PDUrf


Group discussion on a number of issues (if you are reading this, please email Kate Dowling or make changes to reflect your actual comments:

  • Discussion needed on 'roles' but not today
  • Former user (Deleted) starts with Data Model
    • The framework is intended to be a set of options that a profile writer can use to create a profile.
    • jim pasquale asks if the meeting can be recorded. No objections, so recording starts with Former user (Deleted) introducing the data model and the role of frameworks.
      • Actual receipts are issued based on profiles.
      • The data model is intentionally broad and generic
      • Framework rules should be permissive and suggestive. The framework is too broad and generic to issue a receipt on purpose.
      • Profiles MAY be contributed to the WG, but not required.
      • Former user (Deleted) will check on where/if roles are in the data model in response to a question from Former user (Deleted)
      • Salvatore D'Agostino asks about considering how the Open Notice Receipt Schema relates to the PDURF.
      • Joe Andrieu will be invited to the next meeting to talk about the data model, hopefully after reviewing feedback and comments on the contribution.
New BusinessAll

jim pasquale announces that Kate Dowling has volunteered to be the Recording Secretary starting with the next meeting of the WG.

jim pasquale summarized an email from Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) to the group about IPR and the AdvCIS work. Summary of response:

  1. Not possible change IPR midway through WG activity
  2. Also not possible to have a dual-IPR regime in a single WG
  3. A new WG can be started with the desired IPR (P&C opt out to RAND) which would require a significant effort on staff to get approval for work under current IPR to new IPR - very heavy lift.
  4. A new IP option would take a business case, community consideration, 45 day public comment and an all member ballot - several month.
  5. Taking the existing work elsewhere requires an explict license granted by Kantara.

Next meeting

All

*** Next call 2020-10-29 10:30 am Eastern DAYLIGHT Time

(skipping IIW week)

https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/323930725

Adjournment

Moved:

Seconded:

Motion carried



...

Action Items

  •  Type your task here, using "@" to assign to a user and "//" to select a due date