...
- There are various structures that the governance committee can explore. Aaron mentions the educational - legal - industry representation in the governance steering committee.
- Tom brings up different structure that can be organised by issues, (privacy/security) Another approach - organise by type of expertise. (policy/legal/policy) various types of representation that need to be brought up.
- Many participants are not even thinking about this today. Needs to be organised with future participants in mind.
- The issue of liability was raised.
- Presumption that there would need to be a corporate entity to accommodate the needs of NSTIC operations. Which would have a potential for liability.
- Tom notes that authority will come from with-in the structure. from the participants.
- Indicating that the governance committee needs to be representative
- What stake will the government take in the steering of this corporate body?
- Kantara has a good model of governance to draw upon for response,
- Mark Notes: a A Kantara response may include representing international standards in privacy, Perhaps -the need for members of the steering committee . Suggestions were made that the steering committee will need to represent standards community according to particular areas of governance. Assessment criteria and process will be needed for each of these areas. FICAM being one of them.
Issues
- Organize by Issue or type of expertise.
...
- Motion of minutes approval for 11 Jan & 05 May 2011
- Motion to approve minutes as captured on 11 Jan and 05 May moved by Mark. Seconded by Gershon. No further discussion or objection. Minutes are approved.
- The issue of the ITAC presentation was raised
- P3 will convene a call for next week to further discuss NSTIC and address an RFP / reduced scope for the the PAF / PAC (Privacy Assessment Criteria).
...