...
scott: haven't seen proposal yet
scott: seems like IdP-ISA interaction is protocol-specific not something for ULX as per discussion under "staying out of authn/z flows"
...discussion about various kinds of selectors and their roles...
scott: seems like there is inevitable difference in UI between remote ISA ("just a web site") and a real client
jb: there are different models ...
scott: mozilla seems to be pursuing protocol-based approach; should that influence/determine what ULX does? since we're trying to be non-protocol-dependent? and hoping for more commonality? Is someone willing to do work of getting mozilla and ulx together on this?
jb: common claim descriptions would be great ...
jb: some carriers see ISA-based ULX as being more or less
"standardized RPX"
keith: in my use case RP wants to organize IdPs into groups and do ordering, via selector, eg make cheaper ones more obvious
scott: seems like we need to see these UIs
keith: can try to provide, have some examples of complex UIs
bob: is there a principle of IdP neutrality?
scott: have seen maps, eg, but that's concrete hard to imagine something generic or what the role of standard would be
scott: ordering was left out of JSON proposal ...
philippe: ISA work included use cases where the UI is influenced by both RP's prefs and user prefs, should look back at those
scott: question is how this is made concrete in UI how much commonality are we proposing?
scott: will post follow up messages to list on particular items
scott: LoA of attrs is out of scope for ULX
jb: if someone came up with attr LoA method, ULX could look at how it could be used in UI
Next Meeting
- Time: 08:00 PDT | 11:00 EDT | 15:00 UTC/GMT | 17:00 CEST (Time Chart)
- Skype: +9900827042954214
- US Dial-In: +1-201-793-9022
- Room Code: 295-4214