...
- making John Bradley be the lynch-pin.
- use existing discussion groups – Kantara is the obvious place.
- Go out to all the places having discussions – unscaleable.
What is the “internet of things” attribute schema?
- MIBS (++).
- Attributes of things as well as attributes of people.
- Devices – as identity consumers as well as having identities themselves. Is device identity more a projection of personal identity?
- Too much, too many, too patchy.
- Collision-resistant namespaces - the OpenID Connect approach.
Solutions:
- A simple way to design attribute schema.
- Attribute registry?
- Things that don’t assume that there will be one of every type.
- Agreement around extensibility.
- IANA?
- Context provider – in what context can I use this context?
Where does the conversation about this happen? Who operates an attribute registry? We need real participants who will benefit from this.
- Fostering Implementation
- Developing the business case, putting time and effort in to adoption of what we have now.
- Discussions to be had around what is the right scope to put around the structure of attributes – filtering, flexibility, assertion.
Solutions:
- ????
Unclear spaces
- Language code – still not a coherent way to express preferred language.
Solutions:
- write up an RFC on problematic points?
OVERALL ACTION: Give these notes to OIX and Kantara