Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Roll call

tbs

Minutes approval

tbs

Trust elevation TC writeup reviews and trust elevation/ABAC generally

Andrew wants a half-page, and it's hard to keep it that short! Please review and shorten. (smile) Is the permission ticket an essential concept for trust elevation, or not? Step-up authentication is one mechanism; non-uniquely identifying, but nonetheless trusted, claims are another that seems special to UMA ("CBAC").

There's a conversation going on about the role of software statements and OIDC in trust elevation. Mike has been following this.

NIST has an ABAC "building block" under review; Bill Fisher has reached out to offer a conversation with UMAnitarians. Eve will coordinate.

Restricting GitHub editing

Do we need to worry about this? The upside is total IP protection. The downside is the pain of making all WG participants get GitHub accounts (a pain to the people) and become collaborators on the repo to submit GitHub issues (a pain to the repo admins).

Current sensibility is positive.

Legal subgroup report

We've been in massive use-case collection mode. The APAC sync folks had interest and asked about the big thread. We hope to start mappings to legal concepts very soon.

Andi expresses a hope that specific jurisdictional legal requirements won't impact the specs.

Issue resolution work

tbs

AI status

...

As of 30 Jul 2015 (pre-meeting), quorum is 7 of 12. (François, Domenico, Sal, Thomas, Andi, Phani, Robert, Maciej, Eve, Arlene, Irwin, Mike)

...

  1. Eve
  2. Andi
  3. Arlene
  4. Mike
  5. Maciej

Non-voting participants:

  • tbsAdrian
  • James
  • Sarah

Regrets:

  • tbsMark