Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Information Sharing Work Group Teleconference

Table of Contents
maxLevel3
minLevel3
typeflat
separatorpipe

Date and Time

  • Tuesday  April 30 : 4 June 4  : 12:30 pm PDT, 73:30pm EDT,  8:30pm UK,
  • Wednesday May 1June 5 :  12:30 am UK, 9:4:30am JT, 117:30am NZDTNZT

  • Please join  my meeting  via GoToMeeting
  • Join the conference call
    • Skype: +99051000000481
    • US Dial-In: +1-805-309-2350
    • UK Dial-In: +44-20-3137-5285
    • Conference ID: 178-2540
    • GoToMeeting ID: 844-771-298

Attendees

  • Joe Andrieu
  • Lionel KleeMark Lizar

Apologies

Agenda

  1. Attendance
  2. Approval of Prior Minutes & Other Motions
  3. Prior Action Item Review
  4. Continuing Business
    1. PII
    2. NSTIC
    3. Open Notice/Consent Commons ( http://opennotice.org  )
    4. Survey
    5. Label Redesign
    6. Code base
  5. New Business
  6. Action Item Review

Minutes

1. Attendance

We noted that with 2 voting members in attendance, quorum was not met. 

2. Motions

None

3. Prior Action Item Review

  1. Joe: Incorporate the NE Moves / Coldwell Banker label into the demo
  2. Joe: publish v.0.5 (sync with Demo)
  3. Joe: Compile use cases into a single doc

4. Continuing Business

Label Redesign Survey

What will change behavior?

Is asking people the right way to find out? A/B testing?

Different Scenarios

  1. Familiarity
    1. They know and trust the company (The Data Recipient), at least for their current relationship, e.g., a Wells Fargo customer.
    2. They don't
  2. Purpose
    1. Inherent value proposition of the online service
    2. Marketing / promotions
  3. Data Sources
    1. Current page
    2. Elsewhere

Pre-Questions

Awareness of sharing

  1. When was the last time you shared data?
    1. Credit card?
    2. Search Queries?
    3. Shipping address?
    4. Facebook / Twitter status
    5. Photos
  2. When was the last time you refused
    1. Why?
    2. What could have changed your decision?
    3. Would any of these have changed your decision
      1. Endorsement by a friend
      2. Reputation
      3. Assertions of good behavior
        1. no reselling, etc.
  3. When do you regularly share information?
  4. Who have you shared data with
  5. What data
    1. have you shared
    2. are you willing to share
    3. are you not willing to share

Questions

What do you look for when considering information sharing?

What questions do you ask when you are deciding about information sharing?

How do you know that the information is going to be used as expected?

Questions that individuals have for Data Recipients

Why do you want this now?

What will you use it for later?

How long do you keep it? (Why?)

Are you going to keep it?

 

[NOTE: The now question speaks to granularity]

Purpose for end user may be to verify expectations, just as much as questioning..

 

Maybe the data transmission details are icing on the cake?

Or at best "over the horizon" option... something to explore rather than something in the forefront.

Nutition Facts labels, there are MANY different details that could be show stoppers for different people (fat, sugar, peanuts, gluten, etc...)

What are the obvious show stoppers for the information sharing label?

Perhaps its in the data. Name, address, DOB, rather than what they do with it.

 

...

Open Notice/Consent Commons ( http://opennotice.org)

Good discussion about how Open Notice might fit into ISWG. Agreed to broaden the ISWG agenda to be more open and inviting to multiple projects in this area, so that different specifications could play under the umbrella. The Standard Label becomes just one of those specifications.

We discussed the need to reach out to other groups and find out what they would be looking for.

We also discussed what exactly is in the Open Notice? 

Consensus that the essence of the notice would be something like this:

 

A Notice Links A Context to One or More Policies, Terms, or Disclosures


 
Context:

 

Type: web page

 

Identifier: (URL, QR code, GUID, GPS, etc.)

 

Scope (e.g., within facility, a mapped boundary, a form submission, a sharing transaction, a website)

 

User’s Jurisdiction?

 

User’s GeoLocation?

List of Notices:

 

Type (Policy, Terms, Disclosure)

 

URL

 

Version

 

Display Name

 

Change Date

 

Expiry Date

 

Use Cases

1. Show the TOS-DR for this webpage

2. Show the standard label for this webpage

3. Show the Mozilla Privacy Icons for this webpage

4. Show the Common Terms for this webpage

5. Show the applicable original TOS, Privacy Policy, etc. for a given web page





Survey

 Updates on the Google doc. Email Joe for access.

Label Redesign

Disclosure.

 

5. New BusinessIIW next week

 

 

 

6. Action Items
  1. Joe: Incorporate the NE Moves / Coldwell Banker label into the demo
  2. Joe: publish v.0.5 (sync with Demo)
  3. Joe: Compile use cases into a single docJoe: Follow up with Valeska O'Leary (Again)

Future To-Dos (so we don't lose them)

  1. Joe: Create an examples section on website and give Iain access
  2. Joe: publish v.0.5

7. Next Meeting

...

60 minutes 

  • Tuesday  May 7  : 12Tuesday  June 11 : 4:30 pm PDT, 37:30pm EDT, 8:30pm UK,
  • Wednesday May 8 June 12 412:30 am UK, 9:30am JT, 711:30am NZTNZDT
  • 60 minutes