P3WG Plenary Meeting 15 November 2012

...

• Tom Smedinghoff
• Anna Slomovic

...

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Colin Soutar <email@colinsoutar.com> wrote:

Thanks Peter –

...

My personal sense, based on how this has gone so far and where we need to get to, is that we would do well to put the “non-parked” considerations in a nicely packaged document and start soliciting comments…   A lot of the parked items can be further developed over time, using the group momentum that I think will build up as people respond to a somewhat polished document.

Enclosed is the framework document as it currently stands – I think a lot of the material is good, but could be a little distracting in the first instance.

How about I capture in the notes for today, something to the effect of “Peter Capek has graciously offered to take the PAC document to the next stage,  by incorporating and expanding upon the notes collected to date into a document that can be commented upon by the general group.  We are still soliciting an editor for this document in the longer term – Peter has indicated that he would step aside beyond this next stage if there is someone with a strong interest to take on the editor role.”

Minutes & Notes

Administration

Motion for minutes -

Call not at quorum 

Discussion

2. Privacy Assessment Criteria
Peter Capek has graciously offered to take the PAC document to the next stage,

...

 by incorporating and expanding upon the notes collected to date into a document that can be commented upon by the general group.  We are still soliciting an editor for this document in the longer term – Peter has indicated that he would step aside beyond this next stage if there is someone with a strong interest to take on the editor role.

Meeting Adjourned at 11.15