Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Minutes

Roll call

tbsQuorum was reached.

Approve minutes

tbs

Issue 239 materials

tbsApprove minutes of UMA telecon 2016-03-17: APPROVED.

Issue 239 materials

We agreed to remove "as the sole means of trust elevation" because SHOULD is the operative instruction regardless.

Discussion of the new security considerations: We're not allowing both endpoints because it's a big mess to have to deal with "old" clients along with "new" clients. You'd have to flag clients in some fashion. So this section is something of a rationale for the endpoint swap. Eve suggested a slight wording change to give it this flavor.

MOTION: Moved by Sarah. Seconded by Sal: Approve the "UMA Claims-Gathering Extension for Enhanced Security" specification, as to be amended, as a draft Technical Specification. APPROVED by unanimous consent.

AI: Maciej and Eve (with Oliver): Publish the new extension spec.

What to do with "progressing" this spec? Let's let it lie for now, and think about changes in "batch" with other 2016 roadmap work on the other specs.

What sort of publicity should we do around this? Mention on wiki, on FB, etc. Talk about it at an UMA Update session at IIW?

AI: Eve: Create an issue for the next minor rev of UMA (if there is one) to point back to the extension spec in some fashion and either deprecate it or absorb it, whatever is appropriate.

Wide ecosystem

We reviewed some previously discussed topics about wide ecosystem challenges. What value does the AAT bring? Based on current implementation and usage, it seems valuable for at least narrow and medium ecosystems, but in Justin's experimental work for wide ecosystem purposes he has done away with it entirely. Does a wide ecosystem actually require removing it if it turns out to be valuable for others? Sal points out that some IoT use cases also bring in special circumstances such as disconnection from the network.

AI: Eve: Send wide ecosystem doc and graphics.

Attendees

As of 18 20 Feb 2016, quorum is 6 7 of 1112. (François, Domenico, Kathleen, Sal, Thomas, Andi, Robert, Maciej, Eve, Mike, Sarah, Ran)

  1. tbsDomenico
  2. Kathleen
  3. Sal
  4. Thomas
  5. Maciej
  6. Eve
  7. Mike
  8. Sarah

Non-voting participants:

  • tbsAdrian
  • Justin
  • Arlene
  • Jin
  • John