Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin
Noteinfo
titleDraft Minutes - To be approved March 24, 2010

Kantara Leadership Council Teleconference

Table of Contents
minLevelmaxLevel3
maxLevelminLevel3
typeflat
separatorpipe

Date and Time

...

  1. Roll Call for Quorum Determination
  2. Approval of prior meeting minutes
    1. Review: Leadership Council Teleconference - 2010-01-20
    2. Unofficial Notes: Leadership Council Teleconference - 2010-02-03
  3. Proposed WG: Interoperability Work Group (IOPWG)
    1. Review: IOPWG Charter
    2. Discuss & call for vote
  4. Request: Informal Liaison from Kantara eGov WG to OASIS eGov Member Section (Colin)
  5. Discuss: Policy for WGs/DGs to seek direct funding from sources external to Kantara. (Bob)
    1. Review: http://groups.google.ca/group/kantara-leadership-council/browse_thread/thread/eb989f8a48f72187#
  6. How to Manage Comments on Draft Specifications During Review Period
    1. Review: http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/2010-February/000834.html
  7. Discuss: LC Support for WG/DG Evangelism
    1. Review: http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/2010-January/000796.html
    2. Review: http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/2010-January/000799.html
  8. Reminder: Kantara Conference - Oregon - March 9-11, 2010
    1. Preliminary LC Attendance
    2. LC Agenda Topics
  9. AOB

...

  1. Roll Call for Quorum Determination
    • 9 Voting Members
    • Quorum Met
  2. Approval of prior meeting minutes
    1. MOTION: To accept the minutes as recorded for Leadership Council Teleconference - 2010-01-20
      • Moved by Paul Madsen, seconded, no discussion, approved.
    2. MOTION: To read into the minutes of this meeting the unofficial notes as recorded for Leadership Council Teleconference - 2010-02-03
  3. Proposed WG: Interoperability Work Group (IOPWG)
    1. Review: IOPWG Charter
      • Noted that it will be a standard WG, with the difference that the IRB is reliant on it's output.
      • The WG assumes volunteer effort, though some circumstances may arise indicating a need for funded resources, if necessary to meet relying deadlines.
    2. MOTION: To approve the formation of the Interoperability Work Group (IOPWG) as defined by their charter.
      • Moved by Bob, seconded.
      • DISCUSSION

...