Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date and Time

...

  • Roll
  • IPR
  • Minutes  Approval 
  • Agenda Approval
  • New attendee intros
  • Agenda Items Discussion
    • Actions pending
    • Actions new
  • Updates from the consent community
  • AOB


Minutes

Roll call

Salvatore D'Agostino (Unlicensed)

vitor jesus (Unlicensed)

Mark Lizar (Unlicensed)

PeterD (Deactivated)an Lundquist


IRP Policy Announcement


Quorum was 4 of 5

Approve minutes

  • Will wait for updated minutes from 20210203
  • 20210224 Mintues accepted

...

Minutes

We will proceed with small, bite size chunks of

...

the deltas from 1.1 with regards to the structure of the core receipt.

Header is the notice component w/controller identity

Legal justifiction

...

then follows from there.

Consent notice receipt

...

represents the base max schema, which is

...

the goals for Vnext of the consent receipt.

Extension follow for example by receipt type, interest notice, and/or contract notice.

Action Narrative

...

Actions

Narrative for the effort of the WG.

Delta 1.1.

...

Open issues

Admin Workflow and Resources

Blog Post

  • Workgroup up and running
  • Formalize work plan
  • Expand group participation, open to all
    • ISO input

    Intros...

    ...

      • Presentations from abcd to WG
      • Presented work to DIACC
      • OpenID Paper Submission (Harsh lead)
    • ISO input


    Review of receipt fields. Everyone should review spreadsheet which is in the files folder 

    https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/WA/File+lists 

    Is 1.2 going to be compatible vs. a 2.x, supporting prior version is not a requirement

    Shared 27560 fields and categories

    Comment that V.next should begin to consider requirements for active notice

    PeterD (Deactivated) as an implementer of 1.1. the extensions added in their use case includes time boundaries, association w/terms and use and conditions, as well as privacy policy, semantics around the publication date of the document. Is it possible to get the example from their schema. "On deck is the way back machine for the privacy policies."

    Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) on boarding of privacy policy for broadcasting.

    Discussion of use cases and the need for each of the fields to support the use case.

    Suggestion to make use of the JWS (and JOSE) for the related crypto operations.

    Need to consider how we address differences in credential technology, e.g. distributed ledger, vs. others. 

    Ongoing discussion of legal vs. technical.  Critical update area as legal justification is a gap in 1.1.

    Workbook 

    editable spreadsheet for review: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rxF6yym3CGUgtt-AWbrShpazULkSGj9TH1hPxzaF9h8/edit?usp=sharing 

    Calendar Update



    Work Plan (draft)

    End of March informal freeze specification and fields, also determine areas for later work, not included in current specification publication.

    Early-Mid April (draft for ISO consideration during next comment period)

    End of April draft for circulation 

    End of May consolidate comments

    End of June publication

    Need to coordinate (and determine) ISO 27560 comments and drafts schedule with that of the workgroup.

    Determine any resources we need to support the workgroup and specification publication.

    Discussion of election process, desire to have WG leadership roles apart from Chair, Vice-Chair, Secretary, Editor. Open to adding these as the opportunity arises.



    As of 17 February Quorum is 3 of 5.