Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

What is the WG program to review, and eventually ratify the profileUK Pensions Dashboards Profile?

  1. Implementor's draft >based on the contribution accepted by the WG in December 2020>
  2. WG item(current status) > WG review and commentsWG Recommendation(?) > External comments
  3. Draft Technical Specification/Recommendation > External IPR review and comment period (disposition of comments, and a second IPR review and comment period if substantive comments require normative changes etc).
  4. Kantara Recommendation "Kantara recommends this specification for adoption" following an All Member Ballot to approve it to this stage.
  5. From there, other standards body would accept national or international standards bodies could accept it for 'standardization' eg Consent Receipts at ISOas was the case for the Consent Receipt specification into ISO/IEC 29184

How does this review process normally occur?

...

No, there's no requirement for this right now, the document is an 'Implementor's Implementers Draft' to participate  facilitate participation in a specific UMA environment/ecosystem. Useful elements of the profile can be pulled into profiles afterwards

...

Some upcoming changes, The Pension Finder Service (PFS service ) may not receive the user information, instead the PFS may be 'merged' with the responsibilities of the AS. Consent to find pensions is recorded at the UMA AS. 

...

The AS federates to at least two IDPS, 1) Citizen IDP, IAL login and attributes for Alice 2) Advisor IDP, login and attributes for Bob
When Alice delegates a resource, she must provide enough information about Bob such that the AS can match the permission to Bob's ID at the Advisor IDP service

There is a youtube video demonstration to help make this more real (link to be found!)real 

Attendees

As of October 26, 2020, quorum is 5 of 9. (Michael, Karim, Domenico, Peter, Sal, Thomas, Andi, Alec, Eve)

...