Group discussion on a number of issues (if you are reading this, please email Former user (Deleted) or make changes to reflect your actual comments:
Discussion around the review of comments in V2 of the PDURF and the merge of two external versions (sent over email in the summer & also noted in the comments).Former user
Mark Lizar (Deleted) discussion on next steps around reviewing the revised Data Model.
Discussion around best manner to address comments - proposed to focus on the substantive discussion items with Former user (Deleted) and Former user (Deleted) leading the discussion of their respective comments.
Former user (Deleted) discussion on refreshing consent and 2FA authentication communication - UC4. This eliminates potential dark patterns whereby conflagration between these two items might be possible.
Former user (Deleted) discussion on the Data Operation Party - addition of Receipt Authority, to the existing Receipt Issuer, Receipt Recipient. Is the Receipt Authority a separate category (legal entity / framework / policy endpoint), and therefore not a Data Operator?
Input / Output recipients of data are NOT Data Operators
However, the Receipt Authority is also a Data Operator
Not possible change IPR midway through the WG activity
Also not possible to have a dual-IPR regime in a single WG
A new WG can be started with the desired IPR (P&C opt-out to RAND) which would require a significant effort on staff to get approval for work under current IPR to new IPR - very heavy lift.
A new IP option would take a business case, community consideration, 45-day public comment, and an all-member ballot - several months.
Taking the existing work elsewhere requires an explicit license granted by Kantara.
Which were taken meeting notes on 10/15 version 9, and regurgitated here to those still on at the end call.
Announcements
All
New Business
All
Next meeting
All
*** Next call 2020-11-19 10:30 amEastern DAYLIGHT Time