Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin

...

Kantara eGov Group Teleconference

Table of Contents
minLevelmaxLevel3
maxLevelminLevel3
typeflat
separatorpipe

Date and Time

  • Date: Day Wednesday, Month Day#December 2nd, Year#2009
  • Time: X 1pm PDT | X 4pm EDT | X UTC10 CET

Attendees

  • Attendee 1
  • Attendee 2
  • Attendee 3
  • Attendee 4
  • Attendee 5

...

  • Colin Wallis, DIA, Government of New Zealand (Chair)
  • Fulup Ar Foll, Sun Microsystems (Vice Chair)
  • Kyle

...

  • Meadors, Drummond Group
  • Terry

...

  • McBride, US GSA
  • Bob

...

  • Sunday, Government of Canada
  • Bill

...

  • Young, DIA, Government of New Zealand&nbsp
  • Shin Adachi, NTT

...

  • Bauck Sverre, DIFI Norway
  • Sion Camilleri
  • Patricia Wiebe, Province of British Columbia, Canada

...

  • Brett

...

  • McDowell, Kantara

...

  • ED
  • Joni Brennan, Kantara Staff

Apologies

  • Scott Cantor, Internet 2

Agenda

1) Roll call for Quorum determination  [1] (can someone volunteer to help with Minute taking please?) 
2) Approve Las Vegas (F2F) Minutes, October and November Minutes [2]
3) Review status of Action Items Summary [3]
4) Review Officer Election status
5) eGov SAML 2.0 Profile V2 prep  (please review email threads re this)
6) Discuss: eGov Profiles of OID and IC project - next steps: Step 1 Gap Analysis of US ICAM OID and US ICAM IC. Community volunteers please
7) LC and BoT updates (Incl. Assurance Review Board, Interop Review Board)
8) RSA planning - do we get involved? Concordia?, a panel? Call for other potential activities beyond international eGov profiles
9) Kantara F2F Portland - planning
10) AOB..

     

Apologies

  • Not in Attendance 1
  • Not in Attendance 2
  • Not in Attendance 3

Agenda

  1. Topic 1
  2. Topic 2
  3. Topic 3
  4. Topic 4
  5. AOB

Minutes

1. Topic 1

Summary:

  • Items
  • Bold Items
  • Italicized Items
2. Topic 2

The following officers were agreed upon by unanimous consensus:

Summary:

  • List Items
  • Bold
  • Italicized
3. Topic 3

Summary:

  • List Items
  • Bold
  • Italicized
4. Topic 4
  • Bullet List
    • Second Level Bullet List

1) Roll call:

...

Meeting Notes

1. Roll Call

Summary:

  • 8 out of 14 voting members (quorum) for Minutes only
  • 4 non voting members
  • Noted that moving the call back 30 minutes results in a complete conflict with the ULX call time that Scott Cantor was on.
  • Action 2009-12-02-01: Colin and Joni to propose revised call time.

http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/eGov/Participant+Roster 
 

2. Approve Minutes

http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/eGov/eGov+Meeting+-+2009-11-04 
http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/eGov/eGov+Minutes+-+2009-10-07
http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/eGov/eGov+Meeting+-+2009-09-15

Summary:

  • Attendance of Bill Young in the middle of the call allowed us to establish the quorum.
  • Colin moved to approve the three pending minutes to be approved per Joni's suggestion.

...

  • Terry seconded

...

  • .
  • The three minutes were unanimously approved

...

3. Review Status of Action Items Summary

http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/eGov/Action+Items+Summary

Summary>:

  • 2009-11-04-01: Leave it open, still work in progress
  • 2009-11-04-03:

...

  • Cannot get a login page without joining Orange. Fulup to talk with FT/Orange re a video or screen shots, to make it possible for non Orange customers to view.
  • 2009-11-04-02: Joni

...

  • to follow up

...

  • . Fulup will provide Joni with another contact (Peter Weiss?)
  • 2009-11-04-04: Joni to follow up
  • 2009-10-07-02: Leave open, DGI may be able to begin engagement shortly
  • 2009-09-16-01: Leave open. Soren-Peter not on call to give update
  • 2009-09-15-01: leave open but Terry will follow up Dave T's action. Colin asked if this was not possible then at least release profiles for internationalising, unencumbered with IPR.

...

  • 2009-09-15-02: Overcome By Events now that the OIF JSC has released an RFI for this
  • 2009-09-15-05: Leave open. Is on the LC agenda this week.
4. Review Officer Election status

Fulup confirmed elected as a Vice Chair 5) Chair as per vote in November

5. eGov SAML 2.0 profile v2 preparation

Colin recognized the need to start preparation for that. Kyle suggested at this time of the yearpoint, focus on discussion/requirements, start drafting on February, continue to develop on March April timeframe for the next certification opportunity. Bob Sunday of Canada briefed that their first requirement production date the meeting that Fed Canada's RFP phase 1 goes into production late Spring next year Kyle responded to Colin's question Colin asked why we did not include LoA last time.

At that time, the work was still in progress but not even final at SSTC, or among people like Scott Canter, Paul Madsen and Bob Mogan.

Discussion was ongoing around level of assurance vs metadata vs how to deal with certificates.

Colin updated that SSTC agreed to move it to CD just yesterdayKyle said it was because the OASIS SSTC had not finished the specification and the 3 governments constituting the profile deployed it a different way. Work has gone to CD but not final at SSTC. Discussion ensued on LoA in metadata, how to deal with certificates and Bob's requirement for dual language (see later).

After the call, Bob kindly shared its URL at <http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/SAML2IDAssuranceProfile>.

In response to Brett's question on the lack of LoA in the profile, Bob said that there would be a problem of comparison (of levels of assurance).  here is nothing written on the comparison of the level of the assurance (on Comparison attribute in the SSTC CD to be released) .  EGov and the eGov profile would play a role for proper interpretation into the profilein specifying this for government deployments.

He also mentioned Multilingual requirements would be important for Canada.

6.

...

eGov Profiles of OID and IC

...

Project - next steps

...

Colin had briefly reviewed OID and IMI profiles from the ICAM website and shared his initial thoughts on the call. He liked the consistency in structure between the docs. In IMI, he felt the use of SAML 1.1 token might restrict features Patricia mentioned British Colombia of functionality (e.g. metadata) and the use of a whitelist might not scale in an international context.

Patricia mentioned BC Canada was developing IMI for BC  BC. There were some further work to be done, especially for higher level assurance.

Terry Mcbriede said there was informal discussion to solve such issues jointly between SAML, IMI and OID.  Issue , since there was no standard way.  We do not have real , and there is no complete solution at this moment while pilot is going on underway for OID. He was not concerned so much about the use of SAML 1.1 token because the products which supports support SAML 2.0 token usually handles handle 1.1 as well.

Fulup said still better to have 2.0 token if we have stringent and better interoperability.

Colin told us British Columbia of advised that the outcome of actions 2009-10-07-04 and 05 had found that BC Canada, Netherlands, and possibly part of the UK government are looking at OID or IMI 7) Quick updates:IMI.

Colin re-iterated his call for vendors to step up to take this work forward, firstly with a gap analaysis and then with a comparison analysis of the deployments once there were published profiles of deployments outside of the US.

7. LC and BoT Updates:

Note that RFI for Trust framework from OID foundation: Due was yesterday on December 1, 2009.

ARB is composed of six members

In response to Colin's proposal to have Interop Review Board is still getting established but has 6 members. Colin proposed a sync up with ARB, Brett suggested to think about scheduling, methodologies, etc for dialog after they have two meetings.  This suggestion seemed consensus at the meeting. 10) an IRB representative before or latest on the next call. Brett suggested allowing the IRB some time to meet a couple of times and settle in. General agreement.

10. AOB

Due to the time constrainsconstraints, Colin proposed to discuss agenda item 8 and9 in the mailing list, to which everybody agreed. Meeting (RSA 2010 planning) via email.

Meeting adjourned eight minutes past the hour.

Colin Wallis wrote:

>> Greetings all

>>

Next Meeting

  • Date: Day, Month Day#, Year# - To Be Advised
  • Time: X PDT | X EDT | X UTC (Time Chart)
  • Dial-In: +1-201-793-9022
  • Skype: +9900827044630912
  • Code: 4630912

NOTE: Do not follow the code with a "#" symbol as it may cause the code not to be recognized.