Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Workspace for creating consensus driven methodology and tools for measuring identity outcomes, impacts across different demographics, and overall return on investment (ROI) for adopting more inclusive practices.

...

Category Definitions:

  • Diversity - Organizations should seek to ensure a range of people with various background (e.g., racial, socioeconomic, gender, cultural, age, experience) are represented in the organization

  • Equity - Organizations should seek to deliver solutions that promote fair treatment, and remove systemic barriers for underserved communities participating in the system. Impacts should be measured and made transparent.

  • Inclusion - Organizations should seek to actively participate and engage with the broader community to understand where identity systems are falling short and how they should be improved. Feedback should inform product development.

  • Accessibility - Organizations should seek to design solutions and services in a manner that all people including those with disabilities can fully and independently use them.

Fail Rate / Reject Rate

False Positive Rate

False Negative Rate

Abandonment Rate

Time to Complete

Category

Criteria

Description

Measurement Approach

Pass Rate / Approval Rate

Auto Decision Rate

How often the solution returned a conclusive decision (“accept” or “reject”) for a submission.

True Reject Rate

How often the solution accurately rejected a fraudulent submission

True Accept Rate

How often the solution accurately accepted a legitimate submission

False Reject Rate

How often the solution falsely rejected a legitimate submission

False Accept Rate

How often the solution falsely accepted a fraudulent submission

Resubmit Rate / # of attempts required

How often a person had to resubmit or engage in the process to achieve an outcome

Abandonment Rate

% of people that began but never completed the process

Time to Complete / Time taken to conduct a task.

How long the identity proofing process took to complete

Coverage Accuracy For Demographics

How often an identity can be uniquely resolved for a given population via authoritative data sources

Manual Review Rate

How often an identity has to be reviewed through an in-person or out of band method to resolve to a unique individual.

% of channel referral

How often a user to shifted from one channel to another to complete the identity proofing process

Disparity between initial adjudication and final adjudication

% difference between the initial determination on an identity vs the ultimate determination for the identity