WG NAME (and any acronym or abbreviation of the name):
Consent Management Solutions WG (Consent Management WG)
PURPOSE:
Consent Management Solutions are used to manage the full lifecycle of an individual’s consent for the processing of their personal data. That consent needs to be: freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous.
...
Due to impending deadlines for GDPR, PSD2 and other existing regulations in multiple jurisdictions, there is a market need for guidance and possibly product/service certification for compliant consent management solutions.
SCOPE:
The initial scope of the WG is:
to collect documented current practices for management of privacy notice and
consent from many sources;
to collect requirements from regulations in many jurisdictions;
...
Once the initial scope is complete, additional publications will be scoped for production.
DRAFT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS:
None planned in initial scope of the WG.
OTHER DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS:
“Consent Management Solutions – Best Current Practices” anticipated ready for Ballot four months after WG launch, gap analysis and report before publication.
LEADERSHIP:
Chair: Jim Pasquale, digi.me
...
Secretary: Andrew Hughes, ITIM Consulting
Editor: TBD
AUDIENCE:
Anticipated audience or users of the work.
...
Identity providers and credential providers; Customer Information and Access Management (CIAM) providers
Organizations in the ConsentTech, myData, “Internet of Me” spaces
Privacy and Information Commissioners, Regulators
Consent Management platform providers
DURATION:
The WG will operate long enough to publish v1.0 and v1.1 of the Best Current Practices publication; no less than 12 months.
Once additional publications are identified, the WG participants may choose to extend the WG duration.
IPR POLICY:
The Organization approved Intellectual Property Rights Policy under which the WG will operate.
Kantara Initiative IPR Policy - Option Non-Assertion Covenant
RELATED WORK AND LIAISONS:
Related work being done in other WGs or other organizations and any proposed liaison with those other WGs or organizations.
...
Article 29 Working Party: Guidance
Office of the UK Information Commissioner: Guidance
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada: Guidance
NIST
Internal Report 8112: Attribute Metadata
CONTRIBUTIONS (optional):
A list of contributions that the proposers anticipate will be made to the WG.
- To be confirmed
PROPOSERS:
Names, email addresses, and any constituent affiliations of at least the minimum set of proposers required to support forming the WG. At least 3 proposers must be listed. At least 2 of the proposers must be Kantara Initiative Members.
Jim Pasquale, digi.me, jim@digi.mecommon
Marco Venuti, iWelcome, marco.venuti@iwelcome.com
Andrew Hughes, Individual, AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com