Date and Time
- Date: Tuesday, 17 14 / 01 02 / 2012
- Time: 11h PT / 14h ET / 19h UTC
...
Action Item | Assigned To | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
20111108-04 | Heather | Review the eGov requirements and see what information can be used/discussed at next call | In progress | need to map/check off the requirements in the repository in the text of the report |
20111206-03 | Colin | Report back as liaison with OASIS Trust Elevation | COMPLETE |
|
20111220-01 | Keith | send notes on discussion of the Mapping workshop from the Internet2 MACE-Dir call | In progress | For background, see http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/AMDG/Notes+from+attribute+break-out+session |
20111220-05 | Sal | have an attribute gap session at IIW in January and report back |
|
|
20111220-06 | Sal | report back on the "13+3" DOD attributes | In progress | Did not find this particular reference yet, but found others and added them to the repository; will close by next week (Feb 21) |
20111220-07 | Heather | have initial discussion group report ready by February 14 call | In progress | http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/AMDG/Report+-+DRAFT |
20120103-02 | Keith | Update SCIM info in repository |
|
|
20120131-01 | Sal | Schedule Don Thibeau (OIX-AX) for a DG-AM call in Feb |
|
|
...
20120214-01 | Joanne | Update wiki or send HF email regarding areas of report unclear to someone not embedded in this space |
|
|
Discussion – Report
- some Some struggle with scope, works for people "in the know"
- AI: Joanne to mark up wiki or send HF email regarding what areas are difficult for someone not embedded in the conversation
- modification Modification of AI 20111108-04, for HF to make sure that the eGov requirements are represented in the report
- are Are we talking about contents or containers when discussing attributes? there There is a lot of work at the federation identity level to answer this question, and different protocols approach it differently.
- feedback Feedback on Recommendations
- attributes Attributes - tying it to real people with LoA, which in turn ties back to Governance
- governance Governance - different sectors are doing this, so we have examples in action; UMA should be part of governance, and they are working to fill the gap in user management part of governance
- Kantara could vet the work coming out of the different groups to make sure it all applies broadly; the specific sector groups don't have a wide-enough view to really see how their would can or cannot scale; in general there is a need for someone to provide assurance around attributes, and since Kantara has an existing assurance program around identity this could be a good fit; if OIX is looking to be where an exchange of these things, they can't also be in the business of auditing and assuring these things; at some point we'll need to describe how to do LoA on attributes and there are repository references to this work, but there is no functioning accreditation effort yet
- context Context - create a discussion group to describe what contexts might be and how they might be used; characterizing them and registering/exposing them, a value needs to be put on context; you might be able to capture more of the liabilities and risk if you know the context
- Query Language is more like an OASIS or W3C thing than a Kantara thing; too technical for Kantarathis DG; it plays out here but is not in our mandate
- part of context, perhaps - Mapping the Attribute Ecosystem: technological and sociological - environmental survey of groups and activities in attribute management space (there are dozens at least) and we know about most; can we go to each of those groups and come back with a 1 paragraph description of where they fit in the attrib mgmt attribute management space, where they are orthogonal or overlapping; this should be a prerequisite to the attribute LoA work
- we're trying to see if Attribute Management can actually exist, not discuss what you could do with it
...